Conklin Annalijn I, Monsivais Pablo, Khaw Kay-Tee, Wareham Nicholas J, Forouhi Nita G
Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
WORLD Policy Analysis Center, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
PLoS Med. 2016 Jul 19;13(7):e1002085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002085. eCollection 2016 Jul.
Diet is a key modifiable risk factor for multiple chronic conditions, including type 2 diabetes (T2D). Consuming a range of foods from the five major food groups is advocated as critical to healthy eating, but the association of diversity across major food groups with T2D is not clear and the relationship of within-food-group diversity is unknown. In addition, there is a growing price gap between more and less healthy foods, which may limit the uptake of varied diets. The current study had two aims: first, to examine the association of reported diversity of intake of food groups as well as their subtypes with risk of developing T2D, and second, to estimate the monetary cost associated with dietary diversity.
A prospective study of 23,238 participants in the population-based EPIC-Norfolk cohort completed a baseline Food Frequency Questionnaire in 1993-1997 and were followed up for a median of 10 y. We derived a total diet diversity score and additional scores for diversity within each food group (dairy products, fruits, vegetables, meat and alternatives, and grains). We used multivariable Cox regression analyses for incident diabetes (892 new cases), and multivariable linear regression for diet cost. Greater total diet diversity was associated with 30% lower risk of developing T2D (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.70 [95% CI 0.51 to 0.95]) comparing diets comprising all five food groups to those with three or fewer, adjusting for confounders including obesity and socioeconomic status. In analyses of diversity within each food group, greater diversity in dairy products (HR 0.61 [0.45 to 0.81]), fruits (HR 0.69 [0.52 to 0.90]), and vegetables (HR 0.67 [0.52 to 0.87]) were each associated with lower incident diabetes. The cost of consuming a diet covering all 5 food groups was 18% higher (£4.15/day [4.14 to 4.16]) than one comprising three or fewer groups. Key limitations are the self-reported dietary data and the binary scoring approach whereby some food groups contained both healthy and less healthy food items.
A diet characterized by regular consumption of all five food groups and by greater variety of dairy, fruit, and vegetable subtypes, appears important for a reduced risk of diabetes. However, such a diet is more expensive. Public health efforts to prevent diabetes should include food price policies to promote healthier, more varied diets.
饮食是多种慢性疾病(包括2型糖尿病(T2D))的一个关键可改变风险因素。提倡食用来自五大食物组的各类食物对健康饮食至关重要,但主要食物组间的多样性与T2D的关联尚不清楚,食物组内多样性的关系也未知。此外,健康程度不同的食物之间的价格差距日益增大,这可能会限制多样化饮食的采用。本研究有两个目的:第一,研究报告的食物组及其亚型摄入多样性与发生T2D风险之间的关联;第二,估计与饮食多样性相关的货币成本。
对基于人群的EPIC-诺福克队列中的23238名参与者进行的一项前瞻性研究,在1993年至1997年完成了基线食物频率问卷调查,并进行了中位时间为10年的随访。我们得出了总体饮食多样性得分以及每个食物组(乳制品、水果、蔬菜、肉类及替代品、谷物)内多样性的额外得分。我们对新发糖尿病(892例新病例)使用多变量Cox回归分析,对饮食成本使用多变量线性回归分析。将包含所有五个食物组的饮食与包含三个或更少食物组的饮食相比,在调整包括肥胖和社会经济地位等混杂因素后,总体饮食多样性越高,发生T2D的风险降低30%(风险比[HR]0.70[95%CI0.51至0.95])。在对每个食物组内多样性的分析中,乳制品(HR0.61[0.45至0.81])、水果(HR0.69[0.52至0.90])和蔬菜(HR0.67[0.52至0.87])的多样性越高,新发糖尿病的发生率越低。食用涵盖所有5个食物组的饮食成本比包含三个或更少食物组的饮食高18%(4.15英镑/天[4.14至4.16])。主要局限性在于饮食数据为自我报告,且采用二元评分方法,即一些食物组既包含健康食品也包含不太健康的食品。
以定期食用所有五个食物组以及更多种类的乳制品、水果和蔬菜亚型为特征的饮食,对于降低糖尿病风险似乎很重要。然而,这样的饮食更昂贵。预防糖尿病的公共卫生努力应包括食品价格政策,以促进更健康、更多样化的饮食。