Freeman Ellen W, Sammel Mary D
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2Department of Psychiatry 3Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology and Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Menopause. 2016 Sep;23(9):942-9. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000662.
The aim of this study was to identify temporal associations of anxiety dimensions with menopausal hot flashes in women progressing through the menopausal transition. We hypothesized that associations of both somatic and affective dimensions of anxiety with hot flashes increased in the menopausal transition, and that somatic anxiety was an independent risk factor for menopausal hot flashes.
Hot flashes, anxiety symptoms, hormone levels, and other psychosocial variables were assessed annually for 14 years of follow-up. The 233 women were premenopausal at baseline and continued through 1 year or more after the final menstrual period. Anxiety dimensions were assessed with the Zung Anxiety Scale, a validated measure of affective anxiety and somatic anxiety. Summed item scores were divided by the number of items rated, so that ranges of the two dimensions were comparable.
Seventy-two percent of the sample reported moderate/severe hot flashes during the 14-year interval. There was no significant interaction between anxiety dimensions and menopausal stages. When adjusted for menopausal stage, the magnitude of association between somatic anxiety and hot flashes, however, dramatically increased (odds ratio [OR], 3.03; 95% CI, 2.12-4.32; P < 0.001), whereas the association between affective anxiety and hot flashes increased to a lesser extent (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.57; P = 0.024). Women with high levels of somatic anxiety (top third of the sample) had the greatest risk of hot flashes (P < 0.001). When the anxiety dimensions were considered in combination, the additive effect of high affective anxiety symptoms was minimal, with no significant difference between the group with high affective/low somatic symptoms and the low symptom group in incident hot flashes at each menopausal stage (P = 0.54). In multivariable analysis, somatic anxiety increased the risk of hot flashes more than three times (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 2.16-4.53; P < 0.001), but affective anxiety was not significantly associated with hot flashes after adjustment for other study variables (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.96-1.48; P = 0.117). Time-lagged somatic anxiety scores significantly predicted hot flashes, with a 71% increase in risk (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.21-2.41; P = 0.002). Time-lagged affective anxiety scores did not predict hot flashes (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.87-1.31; P = 0.58).
This study showed a strong predictive association of somatic anxiety with the risk of menopausal hot flashes. The temporal associations suggest that somatic anxiety is not simply a redundant measure of hot flashes but predicts the risk of menopausal hot flashes and may be a potential target in clinical management of perimenopausal women.
本研究旨在确定处于绝经过渡阶段的女性中,焦虑维度与更年期潮热之间的时间关联。我们假设,在绝经过渡阶段,焦虑的躯体维度和情感维度与潮热的关联均会增强,且躯体焦虑是更年期潮热的独立危险因素。
在14年的随访期间,每年评估潮热、焦虑症状、激素水平及其他心理社会变量。233名女性在基线时处于绝经前状态,并在最后一次月经后持续随访1年或更长时间。使用zung焦虑量表评估焦虑维度,该量表是一种经过验证的情感焦虑和躯体焦虑测量工具。将各项目得分总和除以评分项目数,以使两个维度的范围具有可比性。
72%的样本在14年期间报告有中度/重度潮热。焦虑维度与绝经阶段之间无显著交互作用。然而,在对绝经阶段进行调整后,躯体焦虑与潮热之间的关联强度显著增加(优势比[OR],3.03;95%置信区间,2.12 - 4.32;P<0.001),而情感焦虑与潮热之间的关联增加幅度较小(OR,1.27;95%置信区间,1.03 - 1.57;P = 0.024)。躯体焦虑水平高(样本中排名前1/3)的女性潮热风险最高(P<0.001)。当综合考虑焦虑维度时,高情感焦虑症状的累加效应最小,在每个绝经阶段,高情感/低躯体症状组与低症状组在潮热发生率方面无显著差异(P = 0.54)。在多变量分析中,躯体焦虑使潮热风险增加超过三倍(OR,3.13;95%置信区间,2.16 - 4.53;P<0.001),但在对其他研究变量进行调整后,情感焦虑与潮热无显著关联(OR,1.19;95%置信区间,0.96 - 1.48;P = 0.117)。滞后的躯体焦虑评分显著预测潮热,风险增加71%(OR,1.71;95%置信区间,1.21 - 2.41;P = 0.002)。滞后的情感焦虑评分不能预测潮热(OR,1.06;95%置信区间,0.87 - 1.31;P = 0.58)。
本研究表明,躯体焦虑与更年期潮热风险之间存在强烈的预测关联。这种时间关联表明,躯体焦虑并非仅仅是潮热的多余测量指标,而是可预测更年期潮热风险,可能是围绝经期女性临床管理的潜在靶点。