Business Economics Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands; College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Addis Ababa University, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia,.
Business Economics Group, Wageningen University, Hollandseweg 1, 6706 KN, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Aug 1;130:67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
Rabies is a viral disease that can cause fatal encephalomyelitis both in animals and humans. Although incidences of the disease in cattle have been reported, insight in the economic impact of the disease in livestock remains limited. By affecting cattle in subsistence systems, rabies may have extensive economic impacts at household and country levels, in addition to the effects on human health. This study presents estimates of the direct economic impact of rabies at herd level in two representative subsistence cattle-farming systems in Ethiopia, the mixed crop-livestock and pastoral production systems. The economic impacts were assessed by a structured questionnaire administered to 532 cattle-owning households. These households were selected from four districts within two administrative zones; each zone representing a cattle production system. Rabies incidence rates of 21% and 11% at herd level were calculated for the mixed crop-livestock and pastoral production systems, respectively. The incidence rate at cattle level was the same in both systems., i.e. 2%. Herd-level incidence rates were higher in the mixed crop-livestock system than in the pastoral system (P<0.05). Average economic losses per herd due to rabies were estimated at 49 USD per year for the mixed-crop livestock system, and at 52 USD per year for the pastoral system; whereas in affected herds the average losses per year were 228 USD (range 48-1016 USD) in the mixed crop-livestock system, and 477 USD (range 173-1140 USD) in the pastoral system. The average herd-level economic losses were not significantly different between the farming systems; however once the herd was affected, the losses were significantly higher for the pastoral system than for the mixed crop-livestock system (P<0.01). The losses due to rabies in cattle are relatively high for pastoral households, due to their complete dependency on livestock for their livelihoods. Although the current estimates only account for the direct losses resulting from cattle mortality, the estimates already indicate the potential economic gains from a rabies intervention in the dog population, of which the benefits can be shared by the public health sector.
狂犬病是一种病毒病,可在动物和人类中引起致命的脑脊髓炎。虽然已经报道了牛的狂犬病病例,但对家畜中该疾病的经济影响的了解仍然有限。由于狂犬病影响了自给自足系统中的牛,因此除了对人类健康的影响外,它还可能在家庭和国家层面产生广泛的经济影响。本研究在埃塞俄比亚两个具有代表性的自给牛养殖系统(混合作物-牲畜和畜牧业生产系统)中,对狂犬病在畜群层面的直接经济影响进行了评估。通过对来自两个行政区的四个区的 532 户养牛户进行结构化问卷调查,评估了经济影响。每个行政区都代表了一种牛生产系统。在混合作物-牲畜和畜牧业生产系统中,牛群水平的狂犬病发病率分别为 21%和 11%。牛水平的发病率在两种系统中相同,即 2%。混合作物-牲畜系统中的畜群发病率高于畜牧业系统(P<0.05)。由于狂犬病导致的每头牛群的平均经济损失估计为混合作物-牲畜系统每年 49 美元,畜牧业系统每年 52 美元;而在受影响的牛群中,混合作物-牲畜系统每年的平均损失为 228 美元(范围为 48-1016 美元),畜牧业系统每年的平均损失为 477 美元(范围为 173-1140 美元)。在这两种农业系统中,平均畜群经济损失没有显著差异;但是,一旦牛群受到影响,畜牧业系统的损失就明显高于混合作物-牲畜系统(P<0.01)。由于畜牧业家庭完全依赖牲畜维持生计,因此狂犬病对牛的损失相对较高。尽管目前的估计仅考虑了由于牛死亡而导致的直接损失,但这些估计已经表明,对狗群进行狂犬病干预可以带来潜在的经济收益,公共卫生部门可以从中受益。