• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超越需求和期望:确定澳大利亚提供和使用书面医学信息的障碍和促进因素。

Beyond needs and expectations: identifying the barriers and facilitators to written medicine information provision and use in Australia.

机构信息

PhD Candidate, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, NSW, AustraliaAssociate Professor, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, NSW, AustraliaProfessor of Pharmacy Practice, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2014 Apr;17(2):220-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00753.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00753.x
PMID:22390211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5060720/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to explore peoples' needs and expectations of written medicines information (WMI), and to determine the barriers and facilitators experienced or perceived in the context of WMI provision and use.

METHODS

We conducted eight focus groups with 62 participants over 6 weeks in late 2008 in New South Wales, Australia. Using a semi-structured topic schedule and examples of WMI from Australia and other English-speaking countries as a guide, we explored themes relevant to WMI, including participant experiences, attitudes, beliefs and expectations.

FINDINGS

Our findings suggest less than half had previously received WMI, with many unaware of its availability. Many, but not all, wanted WMI to supplement the spoken information they received but not to replace it, and it was predominantly used to facilitate informed choice, ascertain medicine suitability and review instructions. The current leaflets were considered technical and long, and a summary leaflet in addition to comprehensive information was favoured. Accurate side-effect information was the most important element that participants desired. The most common barriers to effective WMI use were time constraints and patient confidence, with participants citing empowerment, time and health-care professional (HCP)-patient relationships as important facilitators.

CONCLUSION

The findings provide insight and understanding of peoples needs and expectations, and clarify issues associated with use and non-use of WMI. Challenges include addressing the barriers, especially of time and HCP attitudes to drive changes to workplace practices, and learning from the facilitating factors to encourage awareness and accessibility to WMI as a tool to empower patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨人们对书面药品信息(WMI)的需求和期望,并确定在提供和使用 WMI 方面所经历或感知到的障碍和促进因素。

方法

我们在 2008 年末于澳大利亚新南威尔士州进行了 8 次焦点小组讨论,共有 62 名参与者,历时 6 周。使用半结构化主题日程表和来自澳大利亚和其他英语国家的 WMI 示例作为指导,我们探讨了与 WMI 相关的主题,包括参与者的经验、态度、信念和期望。

结果

我们的研究结果表明,不到一半的参与者之前收到过 WMI,许多人不知道它的可用性。许多人(但不是所有人)希望 WMI 能补充他们收到的口头信息,但不会取代它,WMI 主要用于促进知情选择、确定药物适用性和审查说明。目前的用药指南被认为技术性强且冗长,参与者更喜欢除全面信息外还有摘要的用药指南。准确的副作用信息是参与者最希望获得的要素。有效使用 WMI 的最常见障碍是时间限制和患者的信心,参与者提到赋权、时间和医患关系是重要的促进因素。

结论

研究结果提供了对人们需求和期望的深入了解,并阐明了与 WMI 使用和未使用相关的问题。挑战包括解决时间和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对改变工作场所实践的态度等障碍,并从促进因素中吸取经验,鼓励人们认识和获取 WMI,将其作为赋予患者权力的工具。

相似文献

1
Beyond needs and expectations: identifying the barriers and facilitators to written medicine information provision and use in Australia.超越需求和期望:确定澳大利亚提供和使用书面医学信息的障碍和促进因素。
Health Expect. 2014 Apr;17(2):220-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00753.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
2
Enhancing provision of written medicine information in Australia: pharmacist, general practitioner and consumer perceptions of the barriers and facilitators.加强澳大利亚书面药品信息的提供:药剂师、全科医生及消费者对障碍因素与促进因素的看法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Apr 23;14:183. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-183.
3
Pharmacist and general practitioner ambivalence about providing written medicine information to patients-a qualitative study.药剂师和全科医生对向患者提供书面药物信息的矛盾态度——一项定性研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):517-30. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.02.006. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
4
Enhancing patient education about medicines: factors influencing reading and seeking of written medicine information.加强患者的用药教育:影响阅读和查找书面用药信息的因素。
Health Expect. 2006 Jun;9(2):174-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00381.x.
5
Written medicine information from English-speaking countries--how does it compare?来自英语国家的书面医学信息——它们有何不同?
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Feb;44(2):285-94. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M402. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
6
Suits you? A qualitative study exploring preferences regarding the tailoring of consumer medicines information.适合你吗?一项关于探索消费者药品信息定制偏好的定性研究。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2013 Aug;21(4):207-15. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00252.x. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
7
Concordance-based adherence support service delivery: consumer perspectives.基于一致性的依从性支持服务提供:消费者视角
Pharm World Sci. 2008 Dec;30(6):846-53. doi: 10.1007/s11096-008-9237-0. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
It's for your benefit: exploring patients' opinions about the inclusion of textual and numerical benefit information in medicine leaflets.这是为了您的利益:探讨患者对药品说明书中纳入文字和数字形式的益处信息的看法。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2013 Aug;21(4):216-25. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-7174.2012.00253.x. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
10
The development and evaluation of written medicines information for type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病书面药物信息的开发与评估
Health Educ Res. 2007 Dec;22(6):918-30. doi: 10.1093/her/cym048. Epub 2007 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Communication of anticancer drug benefits and related uncertainties to patients and clinicians: document analysis of regulated information on prescription drugs in Europe.向患者和临床医生传递抗癌药物的益处及其相关不确定性:对欧洲管制药品处方信息的文件分析。
BMJ. 2023 Mar 29;380:e073711. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073711.
2
Patients' Experiences and Perspectives of Receiving Written Medicine Information About Medicines: A Qualitative Study.患者对接收药品书面信息的体验与看法:一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Mar 9;15:569-580. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S298563. eCollection 2021.
3
What information do patients want about their medicines? An exploration of the perspectives of general medicine inpatients.患者希望了解关于其药物的哪些信息?对普通内科住院患者观点的探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec 8;20(1):1131. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05911-1.
4
Experiences and Views of Medicine Information Among the General Public in Thailand.泰国普通民众对医学信息的认知与看法
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Jun 30;14:1073-1082. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S257454. eCollection 2020.
5
How far are we from a medication use process aiming at well-informed adherent patients with long-term medications in Finland? Qualitative study.在芬兰,我们距离实现让长期用药的患者知情并遵从医嘱的药物使用流程还有多远?定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e036526. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036526.
6
Effect of Education for Hypertensive Patients with Correctly Performed Self-Blood Pressure Monitoring (SBPM).对正确进行自我血压监测(SBPM)的高血压患者进行教育的效果。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Jun 27;7(3):75. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030075.
7
Survey of outpatients' use and needs of patient medicine information leaflets in Thailand.泰国门诊患者对患者用药信息手册的使用情况及需求调查。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Feb;41(1):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0748-z. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
"If I'd Known …"-a Theory-Informed Systematic Analysis of Missed Opportunities in Optimising Use of Nicotine Replacement Therapy and Accessing Relevant Support: a Qualitative Study.“如果我早知道……”——一项基于理论的对优化使用尼古丁替代疗法及获得相关支持过程中错失机会的系统分析:一项定性研究
Int J Behav Med. 2018 Oct;25(5):579-591. doi: 10.1007/s12529-018-9735-y.
9
Conformity of package inserts information to regulatory requirements among selected branded and generic medicinal products circulating on the East African market.在东非市场流通的选定品牌和仿制药的药品说明书信息与监管要求的一致性。
PLoS One. 2018 May 22;13(5):e0197490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197490. eCollection 2018.
10
Community-based initiatives improving critical health literacy: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence.基于社区的提高关键健康素养的举措:定性证据的系统评价与元综合分析
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 20;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4570-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of consumer medication information dispensed in retail pharmacies.零售药店所分发的消费者用药信息评估。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Aug 9;170(15):1317-24. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.263.
2
Written medicine information from English-speaking countries--how does it compare?来自英语国家的书面医学信息——它们有何不同?
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Feb;44(2):285-94. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M402. Epub 2010 Jan 26.
3
The evolving concept of health literacy.健康素养的不断演变的概念。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(12):2072-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.050. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
4
Health information for patients: time to look beyond patient information leaflets.患者健康信息:是时候超越患者信息手册了。
J R Soc Med. 2008 Sep;101(9):447-53. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.080149.
5
Do patients' expectations influence their use of medications? Qualitative study.患者的期望会影响他们对药物的使用吗?定性研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2008 Mar;54(3):384-93.
6
The role and value of written information for patients about individual medicines: a systematic review.关于特定药物的患者书面信息的作用和价值:一项系统综述。
Health Expect. 2007 Sep;10(3):286-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00454.x.
7
A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research on the role and effectiveness of written information available to patients about individual medicines.对关于患者可获取的有关个别药物的书面信息的作用和效果的定量和定性研究的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Feb;11(5):iii, 1-160. doi: 10.3310/hta11050.
8
Focus group research and "the patient's view".焦点小组研究与“患者视角”
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(8):2091-104. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.016. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
9
Involving women with breast cancer in the development of a patient information leaflet for anticipatory nausea and vomiting.让乳腺癌患者参与一份关于预期性恶心和呕吐的患者信息手册的编写。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2005 Mar;9(1):33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2004.07.003.
10
Why organizations continue to create patient information leaflets with readability and usability problems: an exploratory study.为何医疗机构持续制作存在可读性和可用性问题的患者信息手册:一项探索性研究。
Health Educ Res. 2005 Aug;20(4):485-93. doi: 10.1093/her/cyh009. Epub 2004 Dec 21.