Perret Nicole, Longo Giuseppe
Centre Cavaillès, République des Savoirs, CNRS USR 3608, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.
Centre Cavaillès, République des Savoirs, CNRS USR 3608, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France; Department of Integrative Physiology and Pathobiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2016 Oct;122(1):11-15. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
Reductionism is the dominant stance of biology. According to this perspective, biological phenomena have to fit with physical explanations. Some biologists thought that the introduction of the idea of program was a sound way to overcome both physicalism and reductionism. We argue instead that the introduction of information theory into biology did not liberate biology from reductionism. We argue that the adoption of information in biology is an erroneous transposition from a specific mathematical domain to one where it does not belong. Indeed, the mathematical framework of the information theory is too rigid and discrete to fit with biological phenomena. Therefore, information in biology represents an inappropriate metaphor. Then, we make explicit the use of metaphors and the choice of explanation mode. We argue that the choice of explanation is not neutral. Furthermore, the use of metaphors in science becomes dangerous when they take the place of theories and they lose their paradoxical content.
还原论是生物学的主导立场。按照这种观点,生物现象必须符合物理解释。一些生物学家认为引入程序的概念是克服物理主义和还原论的合理方式。相反,我们认为将信息理论引入生物学并没有使生物学摆脱还原论。我们认为在生物学中采用信息是从一个特定的数学领域到一个它并不属于的领域的错误转换。事实上,信息理论的数学框架过于僵化和离散,无法与生物现象相契合。因此,生物学中的信息是一个不恰当的隐喻。然后,我们明确了隐喻的使用和解释模式的选择。我们认为解释的选择并非中立。此外,当科学中的隐喻取代理论并失去其矛盾性内容时,它们就变得危险了。