Issa Amine N, Herman Nicole M, Wentz Robert J, Taylor Bryan J, Summerfield Doug C, Johnson Bruce D
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Wilderness Environ Med. 2016 Sep;27(3):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
It is well documented that cognitive performance may be altered with ascent to altitude, but the association of various cognitive performance tests with symptoms of acute mountain sickness (AMS) is not well understood. Our objective was to assess and compare cognitive performance during a high-altitude expedition using several tests and to report the association of each test with AMS, headache, and quality of sleep.
During an expedition to Mount Everest, 3 cognitive tests (Stroop, Trail Making, and the real-time cognitive assessment tool, an in-house developed motor accuracy test) were used along with a questionnaire to assess health and AMS. Eight team members were assessed pre-expedition, postexpedition, and at several time points during the expedition.
There were no significant differences (P >.05) found among scores taken at 3 time points at base camp and the postexpedition scores for all 3 tests. Changes in the Stroop test scores were significantly associated with the odds of AMS (P <.05). The logistic regression results show that the percent change from baseline for Stroop score (β = -5.637; P = .032) and Stroop attempts (β = -5.269; P = .049) are significantly associated with the odds of meeting the criteria for AMS.
No significant changes were found in overall cognitive performance at altitude, but a significant relationship was found between symptoms of AMS and performance in certain cognitive tests. This research shows the need for more investigation of objective physiologic assessments to associate with self-perceived metrics of AMS to gauge effect on cognitive performance.
有充分文献记载,认知能力可能会随着海拔升高而改变,但各种认知能力测试与急性高原病(AMS)症状之间的关联尚不清楚。我们的目的是在一次高海拔探险期间使用多种测试来评估和比较认知能力,并报告每项测试与AMS、头痛及睡眠质量之间的关联。
在一次珠峰探险期间,使用了3种认知测试(斯特鲁普测试、连线测试以及实时认知评估工具,一种内部开发的运动准确性测试)以及一份问卷来评估健康状况和AMS。8名队员在探险前、探险后以及探险期间的几个时间点接受了评估。
大本营3个时间点的测试得分与探险后的得分相比,所有3项测试均未发现显著差异(P>.05)。斯特鲁普测试得分的变化与AMS的几率显著相关(P<.05)。逻辑回归结果显示,斯特鲁普得分相对于基线的变化百分比(β=-5.637;P=.032)以及斯特鲁普测试尝试次数(β=-5.269;P=.049)与符合AMS标准的几率显著相关。
在高海拔地区未发现总体认知能力有显著变化,但发现AMS症状与某些认知测试的表现之间存在显著关系。这项研究表明,需要对客观生理评估进行更多调查,以便与AMS的自我感知指标相关联,从而评估对认知能力的影响。