Murakami Michio
Department of Health Risk Communication, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima City, Japan
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016 Sep;171(1):156-62. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw211. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
Understanding how to establish standards is essential for risk communication and also provides perspectives for further study. In this paper, the concept of risk analysis as regulatory science for the establishment of standards is demonstrated through examples of standards for evacuation and provisional regulation values in foods and drinking water. Moreover, academic needs for further studies related to standards are extracted. The concepts of the traditional 'Standard I', which has a paternalistic orientation, and 'Standard II', established through stakeholder consensus, are then systemized by introducing the current status of the new standards-related movement that developed after the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident, and the perspectives of the standards are discussed. Preparation of standards on the basis of stakeholder consensus through intensive risk dialogue before a potential nuclear power plant accident is suggested to be a promising approach to ensure a safe society and enhance subjective well-being.
理解如何制定标准对于风险沟通至关重要,也为进一步研究提供了视角。本文通过食品和饮用水的疏散标准及暂行规定值的示例,阐述了将风险分析作为制定标准的监管科学这一概念。此外,还提炼了与标准相关的进一步研究的学术需求。通过介绍福岛核电站事故后新的标准相关运动的现状,将具有家长式导向的传统“标准一”和通过利益相关者共识建立的“标准二”的概念进行了系统化,并讨论了这些标准的视角。建议在潜在的核电站事故发生前,通过深入的风险对话在利益相关者共识的基础上制定标准,这是确保社会安全和提高主观幸福感的一种有前景的方法。