FeldmanHall Oriel, Dalgleish Tim, Evans Davy, Navrady Lauren, Tedeschi Ellen, Mobbs Dean
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Medical Research Council, Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2016 Aug;7(6):542-551. doi: 10.1177/1948550616647448. Epub 2016 May 25.
Moral perceptions of harm and fairness are instrumental in guiding how an individual navigates moral challenges. Classic research documents that the gender of a target can affect how people deploy these perceptions of harm and fairness. Across multiple studies, we explore the effect of an individual's moral orientations (their considerations of harm and justice) and a target's gender on altruistic behavior. Results reveal that a target's gender can bias one's readiness to engage in harmful actions and that a decider's considerations of harm-but not fairness concerns-modulate costly altruism. Together, these data illustrate that moral choices are conditional on the social nature of the moral dyad: Even under the same moral constraints, a target's gender and a decider's gender can shift an individual's choice to be more or less altruistic, suggesting that gender bias and harm considerations play a significant role in moral cognition.
对伤害和公平的道德认知有助于指导个体应对道德挑战。经典研究表明,目标对象的性别会影响人们如何运用这些对伤害和公平的认知。在多项研究中,我们探讨了个体的道德取向(他们对伤害和正义的考量)以及目标对象的性别对利他行为的影响。结果显示,目标对象的性别会使一个人实施有害行为的意愿产生偏差,并且决策者对伤害的考量——而非对公平的关注——会调节代价高昂的利他行为。这些数据共同表明,道德选择取决于道德二元组的社会性质:即使在相同的道德约束下,目标对象的性别和决策者的性别也会使个体的选择变得或多或少更具利他性,这表明性别偏见和对伤害的考量在道德认知中起着重要作用。