Ninan Marilyn M, Gowri Mahasampath, Christopher D J, Rupali Priscilla, Michael Joy S
a Department of Microbiology , Christian Medical College and Hospital , Vellore , India.
b Department of Biostatistics , Christian Medical College and Hospital , Vellore , India.
Pathog Glob Health. 2016 Jun-Jul;110(4-5):194-9. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2016.1214350. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
Owing to the burden of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, molecular techniques have been approved by the WHO for the rapid diagnosis of the same. The objectives of this prospective, diagnostic study, conducted at Christian Medical College, a tertiary care center in South India, were to compare the performance of line probe assay (GenoTypeMTBDRplus) with culture, as well as the Xpert MTB/Rif assay on sputum samples. Ninety-one consecutive suspects of multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients from January 2013 to June 2013 were enrolled in this study and the results of line probe assay compared to culture and Xpert MTB/Rif. Compared to culture, the assay demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 81.5% (95%CI 67.4-91.1%) and 87.5% (95%CI 71-96.5%) for the detection of tuberculosis, with sensitivity and specificity of 100% (95%CI 85.2-100%) and 93.8% (95%CI 69.8-99.8%), respectively, for rifampicin resistance. For isoniazid resistance, sensitivity and specificity were 89.3% (95%CI 71.8-97.7%) and 100% (95%CI 71.5-100%), respectively. Compared to Xpert MTB/Rif assay, the assay showed a sensitivity of 80% (95%CI 68.2-88.9%) and specificity of 100% (95%CI 85.8-100%) for the detection of tuberculosis a sensitivity of 94.3% (95%CI 80.8-99.3%) and specificity of 94.1% (95%CI 71.3-99.9%) for rifampicin resistance was attained. This assay performed well on smear positive samples, but poorly on smear negative and scanty samples, and can serve as a rapid diagnostic tool, particularly in isoniazid monoresistant cases of tuberculosis, which are not diagnosed by Xpert MTB/Rif.
由于耐多药结核病的负担,世界卫生组织已批准采用分子技术对其进行快速诊断。这项前瞻性诊断研究在印度南部的三级医疗中心基督教医学院开展,目的是比较线性探针检测法(GenoType MTBDRplus)与培养法以及Xpert MTB/Rif检测法对痰液样本的检测性能。2013年1月至2013年6月期间,连续纳入了91名耐多药肺结核疑似患者,并将线性探针检测法的结果与培养法和Xpert MTB/Rif检测法的结果进行比较。与培养法相比,该检测法检测结核病的灵敏度和特异度分别为81.5%(95%置信区间67.4 - 91.1%)和87.5%(95%置信区间71 - 96.5%),检测利福平耐药性的灵敏度和特异度分别为100%(95%置信区间85.2 - 100%)和93.8%(95%置信区间69.8 - 99.8%)。对于异烟肼耐药性,灵敏度和特异度分别为89.3%(95%置信区间71.8 - 97.7%)和100%(95%置信区间71.5 - 100%)。与Xpert MTB/Rif检测法相比,该检测法检测结核病的灵敏度为80%(95%置信区间68.2 - 88.9%),特异度为100%(95%置信区间85.8 - 100%);检测利福平耐药性的灵敏度为94.3%(95%置信区间80.8 - 99.3%),特异度为94.1%(95%置信区间71.3 - 99.9%)。该检测法在涂片阳性样本上表现良好,但在涂片阴性和样本量少的样本上表现不佳,可作为一种快速诊断工具,特别是在Xpert MTB/Rif检测法无法诊断的异烟肼单耐药结核病病例中。