Department of Radiology, University of Parma, Parma Hospital, Parma, Italy ;
Department of Internal and Experimental Medicine, Magrassi-Lanzara, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Jul;4(13):255. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.06.30.
Acute chest pain is an important clinical challenge and a major reason for presentation to the emergency department. Although multiple imaging techniques are available to assess patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS), considerable interest has been focused on the use of non-invasive imaging options as coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). According to several recent evidences, CCTA has been shown to represent a useful tool to rapidly and accurately diagnose coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with low to intermediate cardiovascular risk. CCTA examination has the unique ability to non-invasively depict the coronary anatomy, not only allowing visualization of the lumen of the arteries in order to detect severe stenosis or occlusion responsible of myocardial ischemia, but also allows the assessment of coronary artery wall by demonstrating the presence or absence of CAD. However, routine CCTA is not able to differentiate ischemic from non-ischemic chest pain in patients with known CAD and it does not provide any functional assessment of the heart. Conversely, CMR is considered the gold standard in the evaluation of morphology, function, viability and tissue characterization of the heart. CMR offers a wide range of tools for diagnosing myocardial infarction (MI) at least at the same time of the elevation of cardiac troponin values, differentiating infarct tissue and ischemic myocardium from normal myocardium or mimicking conditions, and distinguishing between new and old ischemic events. In high-risk patients, with acute and chronic manifestations of CAD, CMR may be preferable to CCTA, since it would allow detection, differential diagnosis, prognostic evaluation and management of MI.
急性胸痛是一个重要的临床挑战,也是急诊科就诊的主要原因。虽然有多种影像学技术可用于评估疑似急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的患者,但人们对非侵入性成像选择的兴趣主要集中在冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)和心脏磁共振(CMR)上。根据最近的一些证据,CCTA 已被证明是一种有用的工具,可在低至中度心血管风险的患者中快速准确地诊断冠状动脉疾病(CAD)。CCTA 检查具有独特的能力,可以无创地描绘冠状动脉解剖结构,不仅可以观察动脉管腔,以检测导致心肌缺血的严重狭窄或闭塞,还可以通过显示 CAD 的存在或不存在来评估冠状动脉壁。然而,常规 CCTA 无法区分已知 CAD 患者的缺血性胸痛与非缺血性胸痛,也无法对心脏进行任何功能评估。相反,CMR 被认为是评估心脏形态、功能、活力和组织特征的金标准。CMR 提供了广泛的工具,可用于诊断心肌梗死(MI),至少在心脏肌钙蛋白升高的同时,可区分梗死组织和缺血心肌与正常心肌或模拟情况,并区分新的和旧的缺血事件。在急性和慢性 CAD 表现的高危患者中,CMR 可能优于 CCTA,因为它可以检测、鉴别诊断、预后评估和管理 MI。