Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1025 W. Johnson St., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Psychometrika. 2012 Jul;77(3):581-609. doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9262-8. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
A two-step Bayesian propensity score approach is introduced that incorporates prior information in the propensity score equation and outcome equation without the problems associated with simultaneous Bayesian propensity score approaches. The corresponding variance estimators are also provided. The two-step Bayesian propensity score is provided for three methods of implementation: propensity score stratification, weighting, and optimal full matching. Three simulation studies and one case study are presented to elaborate the proposed two-step Bayesian propensity score approach. Results of the simulation studies reveal that greater precision in the propensity score equation yields better recovery of the frequentist-based treatment effect. A slight advantage is shown for the Bayesian approach in small samples. Results also reveal that greater precision around the wrong treatment effect can lead to seriously distorted results. However, greater precision around the correct treatment effect parameter yields quite good results, with slight improvement seen with greater precision in the propensity score equation. A comparison of coverage rates for the conventional frequentist approach and proposed Bayesian approach is also provided. The case study reveals that credible intervals are wider than frequentist confidence intervals when priors are non-informative.
引入了一种两步贝叶斯倾向评分方法,该方法在倾向评分方程和结果方程中结合了先验信息,而没有同时进行贝叶斯倾向评分方法所带来的问题。还提供了相应的方差估计量。两步贝叶斯倾向评分提供了三种实现方法:倾向评分分层、加权和最优完全匹配。提出了三项模拟研究和一项案例研究,以详细说明所提出的两步贝叶斯倾向评分方法。模拟研究的结果表明,倾向评分方程中更高的精度可以更好地恢复基于频率的治疗效果。在小样本中,贝叶斯方法显示出轻微的优势。结果还表明,围绕错误治疗效果的精度更高可能会导致结果严重扭曲。然而,围绕正确治疗效果参数的更高精度会产生相当好的结果,并且在倾向评分方程中更高的精度会有轻微的改进。还提供了传统频率方法和建议的贝叶斯方法的覆盖率比较。案例研究表明,当先验信息不充分时,可信区间比频率置信区间宽。