Aquino Maria Raisa Jessica Ryc V, Olander Ellinor K, Needle Justin J, Bryar Rosamund M
Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, School of Health Sciences, City University London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
Centre for Health Services Research and Management, School of Health Sciences, City University London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Oct;62:193-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
Interprofessional collaboration between midwives and health visitors working in maternal and child health services is widely encouraged. This systematic review aimed to identify existing and potential areas for collaboration between midwives and health visitors; explore the methods through which collaboration is and can be achieved; assess the effectiveness of this relationship between these groups, and ascertain whether the identified examples of collaboration are in line with clinical guidelines and policy.
A narrative synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies.
Fourteen electronic databases, research mailing lists, recommendations from key authors and reference lists and citations of included papers.
Papers were included if they explored one or a combination of: the areas of practice in which midwives and health visitors worked collaboratively; the methods that midwives and health visitors employed when communicating and collaborating with each other; the effectiveness of collaboration between midwives and health visitors; and whether collaborative practice between midwives and health visitors meet clinical guidelines. Papers were assessed for study quality.
Eighteen papers (sixteen studies) met the inclusion criteria. The studies found that midwives and health visitors reported valuing interprofessional collaboration, however this was rare in practice. Findings show that collaboration could be useful across the service continuum, from antenatal care, transition of care/handover, to postnatal care. Evidence for the effectiveness of collaboration between these two groups was equivocal and based on self-reported data. In relation, multiple enablers and barriers to collaboration were identified. Communication was reportedly key to interprofessional collaboration.
Interprofessional collaboration was valuable according to both midwives and health visitors, however, this was made challenging by several barriers such as poor communication, limited resources, and poor understanding of each other's role. Structural barriers such as physical distance also featured as a challenge to interprofessional collaboration. Although the findings are limited by variable methodological quality, these were consistent across time, geographical locations, and health settings, indicating transferability and reliability.
广泛鼓励在母婴健康服务领域工作的助产士和健康访视员开展跨专业协作。本系统评价旨在确定助产士和健康访视员之间现有的和潜在的协作领域;探索实现协作的方法;评估这两组人员之间这种关系的有效性,并确定所确定的协作实例是否符合临床指南和政策。
对定性和定量研究进行叙述性综合。
14个电子数据库、研究邮件列表、关键作者的推荐以及纳入论文的参考文献列表和引用文献。
如果论文探讨了以下一项或多项内容,则纳入:助产士和健康访视员协作的实践领域;助产士和健康访视员相互沟通和协作时采用的方法;助产士和健康访视员之间协作的有效性;以及助产士和健康访视员之间的协作实践是否符合临床指南。对论文进行研究质量评估。
18篇论文(16项研究)符合纳入标准。研究发现,助产士和健康访视员表示重视跨专业协作,但在实践中这种情况很少见。研究结果表明,从产前护理、护理过渡/交接,到产后护理,协作在整个服务连续过程中可能都很有用。这两组人员之间协作有效性的证据不明确,且基于自我报告数据。此外,还确定了协作的多个促进因素和障碍。据报道,沟通是跨专业协作的关键。
助产士和健康访视员都认为跨专业协作很有价值,然而,沟通不畅、资源有限以及对彼此角色理解不足等几个障碍使其面临挑战。诸如物理距离等结构障碍也是跨专业协作的一个挑战。尽管研究结果受方法学质量参差不齐的限制,但在时间、地理位置和健康环境方面是一致的,表明具有可转移性和可靠性。