Doongaji D R, Sheth A, Apte J S, Lakdawala P D, Khare C B, Thatte S S
J Clin Pharmacol. 1978 Jul;18(7):358-64. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1978.tb01606.x.
Clobazam, a new antianxiety compound, was compared in a double-blind study with diazepam in 40 neurotic outpatients. Twenty-three patients completed the trial under clobazam conditions while 17 patients completed the trial under diazepam conditions. The trial was conducted for a period of four weeks of active drug administration followed by a one-week period of placebo administration. Clobazam was administered in three divided doses of 30 to 40 mg/day, while diazepam was administered in three divided doses of 15 to 20 mg/day, following a fixed dosage schedule. No significant differences were noted between the two treatment conditions during the drug trial period. The patients on clobazam maintained greater improvement during the placebo trial period for the variables "somatic anxiety" and "nights of sleep disturbance." Simultaneous motor coordination tests (hand steadiness test) showed greater improvement on clobazam throughout the trial period in patients with an initial error score greater than 50 points. This difference was significant during the second week of the trial.
在一项双盲研究中,将一种新型抗焦虑化合物氯巴占与地西泮对40名神经症门诊患者进行了比较。23名患者在氯巴占治疗条件下完成了试验,而17名患者在地西泮治疗条件下完成了试验。试验包括为期四周的活性药物给药期,随后是为期一周的安慰剂给药期。氯巴占按每日30至40毫克分三次给药,而地西泮按每日15至20毫克分三次给药,遵循固定的给药方案。在药物试验期间,两种治疗条件之间未观察到显著差异。在安慰剂试验期,服用氯巴占的患者在“躯体焦虑”和“睡眠障碍夜数”变量上保持了更大程度的改善。同时进行的运动协调测试(手部稳定性测试)显示,在整个试验期,初始误差评分大于50分的患者服用氯巴占后有更大改善。这一差异在试验的第二周具有显著性。