Schneegans Sebastian, Bays Paul M
University of Cambridge, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, UK.
Cortex. 2016 Oct;83:181-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.07.021. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
Investigations of working memory capacity in the visual domain have converged on the concept of a limited supply of a representational medium, flexibly distributed between objects. Current debate centers on whether this medium is continuous, or quantized into 2 or 3 memory "slots". The latter model makes the strong prediction that, if an item in memory is probed, behavioral parameters will plateau when the number of items is the same or more than the number of slots. Here we examine short-term memory for object location using a two-dimensional pointing task. We show that recall variability for items in memory increases monotonically from 1 to 8 items. Using a novel method to isolate only those trials on which a participant correctly identifies the target, we show that response latency also increases monotonically from 1 to 8 items. We argue that both these findings are incompatible with a quantized model.
对视觉领域工作记忆容量的研究已趋向于一种表征媒介供应有限的概念,这种媒介在物体之间灵活分配。当前的争论集中在这种媒介是连续的,还是被量化为2个或3个记忆“插槽”。后一种模型做出了强有力的预测,即如果对记忆中的一个项目进行探测,当项目数量等于或超过插槽数量时,行为参数将趋于平稳。在这里,我们使用二维指向任务来研究物体位置的短期记忆。我们表明,记忆中项目的回忆变异性从1个项目到8个项目单调增加。使用一种新颖的方法仅分离出参与者正确识别目标的那些试验,我们表明反应潜伏期也从1个项目到8个项目单调增加。我们认为这两个发现都与量化模型不相符。