Basheti Iman A, Tadros Odate K I, Aburuz Salah
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Applied Sciences University, Amman, Jordan.
Department of Biopharmaceutics & Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Oct;36(10):1075-1086. doi: 10.1002/phar.1833. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
To assess the impact of a medication management review (MMR) service on treatment-related problems (TRPs) and certain clinical outcomes in outpatients.
Prospective randomized controlled study.
Two community pharmacies in Amman, Jordan.
A total of 160 people who visited the two community pharmacies between September 2009 and June 2010.
Patients were randomized into two groups: intervention (82 patients) and control (78 patients) groups. The clinical pharmacist conducted a baseline assessment MMR for patients in both groups to determine the prevalence and type of TRPs; however, recommendations regarding the identified TRPs were only submitted to the physicians of patients in the intervention group.
All patients were followed for an average of 3.39 months after their baseline visit to the pharmacy. The impact of the MMR service for the intervention group was assessed by evaluating the outcomes of the recommendations submitted by the clinical pharmacist to resolve the identified TRPs, physicians' acceptance of the recommended interventions, and the effect of the intervention on certain clinical outcomes: blood glucose levels, blood pressure, and triglyceride levels. Follow-up assessment of the control group included evaluating the outcomes of the identified TRPs (identified and corrected by physicians without any input from the clinical pharmacist) and comparing glucose level, blood pressure, and triglyceride-level results with baseline values. No significant differences in mean number of medical conditions (3.7 vs 3.42, p=0.134), mean number of medications (4.51 vs 4.96, p=0.135), or mean number of TRPs per patient (5.55 vs 5.17, p=0.42) were observed at baseline in the intervention group versus the control group. Follow-up results revealed a high acceptance rate of recommendations by the physicians (94%). Regarding outcomes of TRPs, almost 70% of the identified TRPs in the intervention group were resolved or improved compared with 2% in the control group (p<0.001). Significant differences were found between the intervention group versus control group with regard to mean ± SD glucose levels (99.08 ± 9.66 vs 115.48 ± 17.34, p<0.001), blood pressure (110.36/81.55 ± 9.45/3.91 vs 125.0/88.73 ± 10.34/4.12, p<0.001), and triglyceride levels (148.53 ± 15.98 vs 170.74 ± 6.26, p=0.001).
The MMR service resulted in a significantly lower number of TRPs and significantly improved clinical outcomes, and it was highly accepted by the physicians.
评估药物管理审查(MMR)服务对门诊患者治疗相关问题(TRP)及某些临床结局的影响。
前瞻性随机对照研究。
约旦安曼的两家社区药房。
2009年9月至2010年6月期间前往这两家社区药房就诊的共160人。
患者被随机分为两组:干预组(82例患者)和对照组(78例患者)。临床药师对两组患者进行了MMR基线评估,以确定TRP的患病率和类型;然而,仅将针对所识别TRP的建议提交给干预组患者的医生。
所有患者在基线药房就诊后平均随访3.39个月。通过评估临床药师为解决所识别TRP而提交的建议的结果、医生对推荐干预措施的接受情况以及干预对某些临床结局(血糖水平、血压和甘油三酯水平)的影响,来评估MMR服务对干预组的影响。对照组的随访评估包括评估所识别TRP的结果(由医生识别并纠正,无临床药师的任何参与),并将血糖水平、血压和甘油三酯水平结果与基线值进行比较。干预组与对照组在基线时,平均疾病数量(3.7对3.42,p = 0.134)、平均用药数量(4.51对4.96,p = 0.135)或每位患者的平均TRP数量(5.55对5.17,p = 0.42)方面均未观察到显著差异。随访结果显示医生对建议的接受率很高(94%)。关于TRP的结果,干预组中近70%所识别的TRP得到解决或改善,而对照组为2%(p<0.001)。干预组与对照组在平均±标准差血糖水平(99.08±9.66对115.48±17.34,p<0.001)、血压(110.36/81.55±9.45/3.91对125.0/88.73±10.34/4.12,p<0.001)和甘油三酯水平(148.53±15.98对170.74±6.26,p = 0.001)方面存在显著差异。
MMR服务使TRP数量显著减少,临床结局显著改善,且受到医生的高度认可。