Bone Anna E, Morgan Myfanwy, Maddocks Matthew, Sleeman Katherine E, Wright Juliet, Taherzadeh Shamim, Ellis-Smith Clare, Higginson Irene J, Evans Catherine J
Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Cicely Saunders Institute, King's College London, London, UK.
Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK.
Age Ageing. 2016 Nov;45(6):863-873. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw124. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
understanding how best to provide palliative care for frail older people with non-malignant conditions is an international priority. We aimed to develop a community-based episodic model of short-term integrated palliative and supportive care (SIPS) based on the views of service users and other key stakeholders in the United Kingdom.
transparent expert consultations with health professionals, voluntary sector and carer representatives including a consensus survey; and focus groups with older people and carers were used to generate recommendations for the SIPS model. Discussions focused on three key components of the model: potential benefit of SIPS, timing of delivery and processes of integrated working between specialist palliative care and generalist practitioners. Content and descriptive analysis was employed and findings were integrated across the data sources.
we conducted two expert consultations (n = 63), a consensus survey (n = 42) and three focus groups (n = 17). Potential benefits of SIPS included holistic assessment, opportunity for end of life discussion, symptom management and carer reassurance. Older people and carers advocated early access to SIPS, while other stakeholders proposed delivery based on complex symptom burden. A priority for integrated working was the assignment of a key worker to co-ordinate care, but the assignment criteria remain uncertain.
key stakeholders agree that a model of SIPS for frail older people with non-malignant conditions has potential benefits within community settings, but differ in opinion on the optimal timing and indications for this service. Our findings highlight the importance of consulting all key stakeholders in model development prior to feasibility evaluation.
了解如何为患有非恶性疾病的体弱老年人提供最佳姑息治疗是一项国际优先事项。我们旨在根据英国服务使用者和其他关键利益相关者的意见,开发一种基于社区的短期综合姑息和支持性护理(SIPS)的阶段性模式。
与卫生专业人员、志愿部门和护理人员代表进行透明的专家咨询,包括一项共识调查;并与老年人和护理人员进行焦点小组讨论,以生成SIPS模式的建议。讨论集中在该模式的三个关键组成部分:SIPS的潜在益处、提供时间以及专科姑息治疗和全科医生之间的综合协作流程。采用内容和描述性分析,并整合各数据源的研究结果。
我们进行了两次专家咨询(n = 63)、一次共识调查(n = 42)和三次焦点小组讨论(n = 17)。SIPS的潜在益处包括全面评估、临终讨论机会、症状管理和护理人员安心。老年人和护理人员主张尽早获得SIPS,而其他利益相关者则提议根据复杂症状负担提供服务。综合协作的一个优先事项是指定一名关键工作人员来协调护理,但指定标准仍不确定。
关键利益相关者一致认为,针对患有非恶性疾病的体弱老年人的SIPS模式在社区环境中具有潜在益处,但对于该服务的最佳时机和适应症存在不同意见。我们的研究结果强调了在可行性评估之前,在模式开发过程中咨询所有关键利益相关者的重要性。