Gong Xianmin, Xiao Hongrui, Wang Dahua
Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, PR China; Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, PR China; Beijing Luhe High School, Beijing 100875, PR China.
Cognition. 2016 Nov;156:95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
False recognition results from the interplay of multiple cognitive processes, including verbatim memory, gist memory, phantom recollection, and response bias. In the current study, we modified the simplified Conjoint Recognition (CR) paradigm to investigate the way in which the valence of emotional stimuli affects the cognitive process and behavioral outcome of false recognition. In Study 1, we examined the applicability of the modification to the simplified CR paradigm and model. Twenty-six undergraduate students (13 females, aged 21.00±2.30years) learned and recognized both the large and small categories of photo objects. The applicability of the paradigm and model was confirmed by a fair goodness-of-fit of the model to the observational data and by their competence in detecting the memory differences between the large- and small-category conditions. In Study 2, we recruited another sample of 29 undergraduate students (14 females, aged 22.60±2.74years) to learn and recognize the categories of photo objects that were emotionally provocative. The results showed that negative valence increased false recognition, particularly the rate of false "remember" responses, by facilitating phantom recollection; positive valence did not influence false recognition significantly though enhanced gist processing.
错误识别源于多种认知过程的相互作用,包括逐字记忆、主旨记忆、虚幻回忆和反应偏差。在本研究中,我们修改了简化的联合识别(CR)范式,以研究情绪刺激的效价如何影响错误识别的认知过程和行为结果。在研究1中,我们检验了该修改对简化CR范式和模型的适用性。26名本科生(13名女性,年龄21.00±2.30岁)学习并识别了大小两类照片物体。该范式和模型的适用性通过模型与观测数据的良好拟合以及它们检测大小类别条件之间记忆差异的能力得到了证实。在研究2中,我们招募了另一组29名本科生(14名女性,年龄22.60±2.74岁)来学习并识别具有情绪煽动性的照片物体类别。结果表明,负性效价通过促进虚幻回忆增加了错误识别,尤其是错误的“记得”反应率;正性效价虽增强了主旨加工,但对错误识别没有显著影响。