Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗在卵巢癌治疗中的应用及疗效

Use and Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Treatment of Ovarian Cancer.

作者信息

Meyer Larissa A, Cronin Angel M, Sun Charlotte C, Bixel Kristin, Bookman Michael A, Cristea Mihaela C, Griggs Jennifer J, Levenback Charles F, Burger Robert A, Mantia-Smaldone Gina, Matulonis Ursula A, Niland Joyce C, O'Malley David M, Wright Alexi A

机构信息

Larissa A. Meyer, Charlotte C. Sun, and Charles F. Levenback, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Angel M. Cronin, Ursula A. Matulonis, and Alexi A. Wright, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Kristin Bixel and David M. O'Malley, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH; Michael A. Bookman, US Oncology Research and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AZ; Mihaela C. Cristea and Joyce C. Niland, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA; Jennifer J. Griggs, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI; Robert A. Burger, University of Pennsylvania; and Gina Mantia-Smaldone, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 10;34(32):3854-3863. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.1239.

Abstract

Purpose In 2010, a randomized clinical trial demonstrated noninferior survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared with primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS). We examined the use and effectiveness of NACT in clinical practice. Patients and Methods A multi-institutional observational study of 1,538 women with stages IIIC to IV ovarian cancer who were treated at six National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers. We examined NACT use in patients who were diagnosed between 2003 and 2012 (N = 1,538) and compared overall survival (OS), morbidity, and postoperative residual disease in a propensity-score matched sample of patients (N = 594). Results NACT use increased from 16% during 2003 to 2010 to 34% during 2011 to 2012 in stage IIIC disease ( P < .001), and from 41% to 62% in stage IV disease ( P < .001). Adoption of NACT varied by institution, from 8% to 30% for stage IIIC disease (P < .001) and from 27% to 61% ( P = .007) for stage IV disease during this time period. In the matched sample, NACT was associated with shorter OS in stage IIIC disease (median OS: 33 v 43 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.77) compared with PCS, but not stage IV disease (median OS: 31 v 36 months; HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.52). Patients with stages IIIC and IV disease who received NACT were less likely to have ≥ 1 cm postoperative residual disease, an intensive care unit admission, or a rehospitalization (all P ≤ .04) compared with those who received PCS treatment. However, among women with stage IIIC disease who achieved microscopic or ≤ 1 cm postoperative residual disease, NACT was associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.18; P = .04). Conclusion Use of NACT increased significantly between 2003 and 2012. In this observational study, PCS was associated with increased survival in stage IIIC, but not stage IV disease. Future studies should prospectively consider the efficacy of NACT by extent of residual disease in unselected patients.

摘要

目的 2010年,一项随机临床试验表明,与原发性肿瘤细胞减灭术(PCS)相比,接受新辅助化疗(NACT)的晚期卵巢癌患者的生存率无差异。我们研究了NACT在临床实践中的使用情况和有效性。

患者与方法 对1538例IIIC至IV期卵巢癌女性患者进行多机构观察性研究,这些患者在6家美国国立癌症研究所指定的癌症中心接受治疗。我们研究了2003年至2012年期间确诊的患者(N = 1538)中NACT的使用情况,并在倾向评分匹配的患者样本(N = 594)中比较了总生存期(OS)、发病率和术后残留疾病情况。

结果 在IIIC期疾病中,NACT的使用从2003年至2010年期间的16%增加到2011年至2012年期间的34%(P < 0.001),在IV期疾病中从41%增加到62%(P < 0.001)。NACT的采用因机构而异,在此期间,IIIC期疾病的采用率从8%到30%(P < 0.001),IV期疾病从27%到61%(P = 0.007)。在匹配样本中,与PCS相比,IIIC期疾病中NACT与较短的OS相关(中位OS:33对43个月;风险比[HR],1.40;95%CI,1.11至1.77),但IV期疾病并非如此(中位OS:31对36个月;HR,1.16;95%CI,0.89至1.52)。与接受PCS治疗的患者相比,接受NACT的IIIC期和IV期疾病患者术后残留疾病≥1 cm、入住重症监护病房或再次住院的可能性较小(所有P≤0.04)。然而,在术后残留疾病为显微镜下可见或≤1 cm的IIIC期疾病女性中,NACT与OS降低相关(HR,1.49;95%CI,1.01至2.18;P = 0.04)。

结论 2003年至2012年期间NACT的使用显著增加。在这项观察性研究中,PCS与IIIC期而非IV期疾病的生存率提高相关。未来的研究应前瞻性地考虑在未选择的患者中根据残留疾病程度评估NACT的疗效。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The Propensity Score.倾向评分
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1637-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13480.
7
Patient preferences in advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer.晚期或复发性卵巢癌患者的偏好。
Cancer. 2014 Dec 1;120(23):3651-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28940. Epub 2014 Aug 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验