Suppr超能文献

开发一种针对糖耐量受损和糖尿病的简短、可靠且有效的饮食评估工具:英国糖尿病与饮食问卷。

Development of a brief, reliable and valid diet assessment tool for impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes: the UK Diabetes and Diet Questionnaire.

作者信息

England Clare Y, Thompson Janice L, Jago Russ, Cooper Ashley R, Andrews Rob C

机构信息

1Centre for Exercise Nutrition and Health Sciences,School for Policy Studies,8 Priory Road,University of Bristol,Bristol BS8 1TZ,UK.

3School of Sport,Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences,University of Birmingham,Birmingham,UK.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2017 Feb;20(2):191-199. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002275. Epub 2016 Sep 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Dietary advice is fundamental in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Advice is improved by individual assessment but existing methods are time-consuming and require expertise. We developed a twenty-five-item questionnaire, the UK Diabetes and Diet Questionnaire (UKDDQ), for quick assessment of an individual's diet. The present study examined the UKDDQ's repeatability and relative validity compared with 4 d food diaries.

DESIGN

The UKDDQ was completed twice with a median 3 d gap (interquartile range=1-7 d) between tests. A 4 d food diary was completed after the second UKDDQ. Diaries were analysed and food groups were mapped on to the UKDDQ. Absolute agreement between total scores was examined using intra-class correlation (ICC). Agreement for individual items was tested with Cohen's weighted kappa (κ w).

SETTING

South West of England.

SUBJECTS

Adults (n 177, 50·3 % women) with, or at high risk for, T2DM; mean age 55·8 (sd 8·6) years, mean BMI 34·4 (sd 7·3) kg/m2; participants were 91 % White British.

RESULTS

The UKDDQ showed excellent repeatability (ICC=0·90 (0·82, 0·94)). For individual items, κ w ranged from 0·43 ('savoury pastries') to 0·87 ('vegetables'). Total scores from the UKDDQ and food diaries compared well (ICC=0·54 (0·27, 0·70)). Agreement for individual items varied and was good for 'alcohol' (κ w=0·71) and 'breakfast cereals' (κ w=0·70), with no agreement for 'vegetables' (κ w=0·08) or 'savoury pastries' (κ w=0·09).

CONCLUSIONS

The UKDDQ is a new British dietary questionnaire with excellent repeatability. Comparisons with food diaries found agreements similar to those for international dietary questionnaires currently in use. It targets foods and habits important in diabetes prevention and management.

摘要

目的

饮食建议是2型糖尿病(T2DM)预防和管理的基础。通过个体评估可改进饮食建议,但现有方法耗时且需要专业知识。我们开发了一份包含25个条目的问卷——英国糖尿病与饮食问卷(UKDDQ),用于快速评估个体饮食。本研究将UKDDQ与4天食物日记进行比较,检验其重复性和相对效度。

设计

UKDDQ进行了两次填写,两次测试之间的间隔中位数为3天(四分位间距=1 - 7天)。在第二次UKDDQ之后完成一份4天食物日记。对日记进行分析,并将食物类别对应到UKDDQ上。使用组内相关系数(ICC)检验总分之间的绝对一致性。单个条目的一致性用科恩加权kappa系数(κw)进行检验。

地点

英格兰西南部。

研究对象

患有T2DM或有T2DM高风险的成年人(n = 177,50.3%为女性);平均年龄55.8(标准差8.6)岁,平均体重指数34.4(标准差7.3)kg/m²;参与者91%为英国白人。

结果

UKDDQ显示出极好的重复性(ICC = 0.90(0.82,0.94))。对于单个条目,κw范围从0.43(“咸味糕点”)到0.87(“蔬菜”)。UKDDQ总分与食物日记总分比较良好(ICC = 0.54(0.27,0.70))。单个条目的一致性各不相同,“酒精”(κw = 0.71)和“早餐谷物”(κw = 0.70)的一致性良好,“蔬菜”(κw = 0.08)或“咸味糕点”(κw = 0.09)的一致性较差。

结论

UKDDQ是一份具有极好重复性的新型英国饮食问卷。与食物日记的比较发现,其一致性与目前使用的国际饮食问卷相似。它针对的是糖尿病预防和管理中重要的食物和习惯。

相似文献

2
Assessing the relative validity of the Scottish Collaborative Group FFQ for measuring dietary intake in adults.
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Feb;20(3):449-455. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002421. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
3
Assessing Dietary Habits of Saudi Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at Primary Healthcare Centers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 9;16(11):e73333. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73333. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
Development of a food frequency questionnaire for the estimation of dietary (poly)phenol intake.
Food Funct. 2024 Oct 14;15(20):10414-10433. doi: 10.1039/d4fo03546a.
10
Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Food Group Intake in Pregnant Jordanian Women.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Aug;119(8):1349-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2019.02.009. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Lifestyle habits and type 2 diabetes traits in patients from healthcare centers in Dubai, United Arab Emirates: a cross-sectional study.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 6;16:1436536. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1436536. eCollection 2025.
3
Assessing Dietary Habits of Saudi Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at Primary Healthcare Centers in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Cureus. 2024 Nov 9;16(11):e73333. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73333. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
The effects of a digital health intervention on patient activation in chronic kidney disease.
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Nov 12;7(1):318. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01296-1.
8
Dietary Knowledge and Eating Habits among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Lebanon.
Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2024 Feb 6;2024:3623555. doi: 10.1155/2024/3623555. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

2
Changes in reported food intake in adults with type 2 diabetes in response to a nonprescriptive dietary intervention.
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014 Aug;27(4):311-21. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12154. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
3
Dietary biomarkers: advances, limitations and future directions.
Nutr J. 2012 Dec 14;11:109. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-11-109.
6
Counselling patients about behaviour change: the challenge of talking about diet.
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Jan;62(594):e13-21. doi: 10.3399/bjgp12X616328.
7
Fruit and vegetable intake: issues with definition and measurement.
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Jan;16(1):2-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012000985. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
8
Practitioner and lay perspectives of the service provision of nutrition information leaflets in primary care.
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2011 Dec;24(6):552-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2011.01200.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
10
Diabetes UK evidence-based nutrition guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes.
Diabet Med. 2011 Nov;28(11):1282-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03371.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验