• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对未知受众生成指代表达:一种群体共同背景的计算模型。

Production of Referring Expressions for an Unknown Audience: A Computational Model of Communal Common Ground.

作者信息

Kutlak Roman, van Deemter Kees, Mellish Chris

机构信息

Natural Language Generation Group, Computing Science Department, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 31;7:1275. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01275. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01275
PMID:27630592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5005345/
Abstract

This article presents a computational model of the production of referring expressions under uncertainty over the hearer's knowledge. Although situations where the hearer's knowledge is uncertain have seldom been addressed in the computational literature, they are common in ordinary communication, for example when a writer addresses an unknown audience, or when a speaker addresses a stranger. We propose a computational model composed of three complimentary heuristics based on, respectively, an estimation of the recipient's knowledge, an estimation of the extent to which a property is unexpected, and the question of what is the optimum number of properties in a given situation. The model was tested in an experiment with human readers, in which it was compared against the Incremental Algorithm and human-produced descriptions. The results suggest that the new model outperforms the Incremental Algorithm in terms of the proportion of correctly identified entities and in terms of the perceived quality of the generated descriptions.

摘要

本文提出了一种在听者知识不确定的情况下指代表达生成的计算模型。尽管听者知识不确定的情况在计算文献中很少被提及,但在日常交流中却很常见,例如当作者面向未知受众写作时,或者当说话者与陌生人交谈时。我们提出了一个由三种互补启发式方法组成的计算模型,分别基于对接收者知识的估计、对属性意外程度的估计以及给定情况下最佳属性数量的问题。该模型在一项针对人类读者的实验中进行了测试,在实验中它与增量算法和人类生成的描述进行了比较。结果表明,新模型在正确识别实体的比例和生成描述的感知质量方面优于增量算法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/d4581a45b9c1/fpsyg-07-01275-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/53d4cbf3a457/fpsyg-07-01275-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/bdc07ca1048a/fpsyg-07-01275-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/6e335f30b8cd/fpsyg-07-01275-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/e096aaa5a1b3/fpsyg-07-01275-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/6e7ed509035c/fpsyg-07-01275-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/d4581a45b9c1/fpsyg-07-01275-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/53d4cbf3a457/fpsyg-07-01275-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/bdc07ca1048a/fpsyg-07-01275-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/6e335f30b8cd/fpsyg-07-01275-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/e096aaa5a1b3/fpsyg-07-01275-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/6e7ed509035c/fpsyg-07-01275-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53a4/5005345/d4581a45b9c1/fpsyg-07-01275-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Production of Referring Expressions for an Unknown Audience: A Computational Model of Communal Common Ground.针对未知受众生成指代表达:一种群体共同背景的计算模型。
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 31;7:1275. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01275. eCollection 2016.
2
Utility-based generation of referring expressions.基于效用的指称生成。
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Apr;4(2):306-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01185.x.
3
Generation of referring expressions: assessing the Incremental Algorithm.指代生成:评估增量算法。
Cogn Sci. 2012 Jul;36(5):799-836. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01205.x. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
4
Modeling Reference Production as the Probabilistic Combination of Multiple Perspectives.将参考生成建模为多个视角的概率组合。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Jun;42 Suppl 4:974-1008. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12582. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
5
The effect of production variables in monolog and dialog on comprehension by novel listeners.独白和对话中的产出变量对新听众理解的影响。
Lang Speech. 2001 Sep;44(Pt 3):325-50. doi: 10.1177/00238309010440030201.
6
Age-related differences in communication and audience design.沟通与受众设计中的年龄相关差异。
Psychol Aging. 2007 Jun;22(2):281-290. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.281.
7
Accuracy of nurses' perceptions of voice hearing and psychiatric symptoms.护士对幻听和精神症状认知的准确性。
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Apr;58(2):130-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.04162.x.
8
Interpreting uncertainty terms.解释不确定术语。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Aug;107(2):219-28. doi: 10.1037/a0036930.
9
Referring expressions and structural language abilities in children with specific language impairment: A pragmatic tolerance account.特定语言障碍儿童的指称表达与结构语言能力:一种语用容忍度解释。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Apr;144:98-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
10
Interface of Linguistic and Visual Information During Audience Design.受众设计过程中语言与视觉信息的界面
Cogn Sci. 2015 Aug;39(6):1419-33. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12207. Epub 2014 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games.预测语言游戏中的语用推理。
Science. 2012 May 25;336(6084):998. doi: 10.1126/science.1218633.
2
To name or to describe: shared knowledge affects referential form.命名还是描述:共享知识影响指称形式。
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Apr;4(2):290-305. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01182.x. Epub 2012 Mar 2.
3
Generation of referring expressions: assessing the Incremental Algorithm.指代生成:评估增量算法。
Cogn Sci. 2012 Jul;36(5):799-836. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01205.x. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
4
The effect of information overlap on communication effectiveness.信息重叠对沟通效果的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;31(1):169-81. doi: 10.1080/03640210709336989.
5
Partner-specific interpretation of maintained referential precedents during interactive dialog.在交互式对话中对维持的参考先例进行特定于伙伴的解释。
J Mem Lang. 2009 Aug 1;61(2):171-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.003.
6
Dispersion of response times reveals cognitive dynamics.反应时间的离散揭示了认知动态。
Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):318-42. doi: 10.1037/a0014849.
7
Don't talk about pink elephants! Speaker's control over leaking private information during language production.别谈论粉色大象!说话者在语言生成过程中对泄露私人信息的控制。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Apr;17(4):273-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01697.x.
8
Limits on theory of mind use in adults.成年人心理理论运用的局限性。
Cognition. 2003 Aug;89(1):25-41. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00064-7.
9
Expertise and estimating what other people know: the influence of professional experience and type of knowledge.专业技能与对他人所知内容的评估:专业经验和知识类型的影响
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2001 Dec;7(4):317-30.
10
Conceptual pacts and lexical choice in conversation.对话中的概念协定与词汇选择
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 Nov;22(6):1482-93. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.6.1482.