Schultz Timothy J, Roupas Peter, Wiechula Richard, Krause Debra, Gravier Susan, Tuckett Anthony, Hines Sonia, Kitson Alison
1School of Nursing, University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia 2CSIRO Food and Nutrition, Werribee, Australia 3Centre for Evidence-based Practice South Australia (CEPSA): a Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence, South Australia, Australia 4School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia 5Nursing Research Centre and Queensland Centre for Evidence Based Nursing and Midwifery: a Joanna Briggs Centre of Excellence, Mater Misericordiae Limited, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 6Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Aug;14(8):257-308. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003063.
Optimizing body composition for healthy aging in the community is a significant challenge. There are a number of potential interventions available for older people to support both weight gain (for those who are underweight) and weight loss (for overweight or obese people). While the benefits of weight gain for underweight people are generally clearly defined, the value of weight loss in overweight or obese people is less clear, particularly for older people.
This umbrella review aimed to measure the effectiveness of nutritional interventions for optimizing healthy body composition in older adults living in the community and to explore theirqualitative perceptions.
The participants were older adults, 60 years of age or older, living in the community.
The review examinedsix types of nutritional interventions: (i) dietary programs, (ii) nutritional supplements, (iii) meal replacements, (iv) food groups, (v) food delivery support and eating behavior, and (vi) nutritional counselling or education.
This umbrella review considered any quantitative systematic reviews and meta-analyses of effectiveness, or qualitative systematic reviews, or a combination (i.e. comprehensive reviews).
The quantitative outcome measures of body composition were: (i) nutritional status (e.g. proportion of overweight or underweight patients); (ii) fat mass (kg), (iii) lean mass or muscle mass (kg), (iv) weight (kg) or BMI (kg/m), (v) bone mass (kg) or bone measures such as bone mineral density, and (vi) hydration status.
The phenomena of interestwere the qualitative perceptions and experiences of participants.
We developed an iterative search strategy for nine bibliometric databases and gray literature.
Critical appraisal of 13 studies was conducted independently in pairs using standard Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Six medium quality and seven high quality studies were identified.
Data was extracted independently in pairs from all 13 included studies using the standard Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction tool.
Only quantitative studies of effectiveness were included. The strength of evidence assessing the effectiveness of interventionswas graded using a traffic light system (green, amber, red). An overall assessment of the quality of the evidence for each comparison was undertaken.
More systematic reviews investigating weight gain than those investigating weight loss were included. Studies onweight gain showed improved body composition for oral nutritional supplements on its own, for oral nutritional supplements in combination with resistance exercise training, and for oral nutritional supplements in combination with nutrition counselling. Studies on weight loss showed that diet in combination with exercise, diet in combination with exercise and nutrition counselling, and nutrition counselling on its own all can lead to reduced weight in older people. The outcomes of lean mass and weight/BMI were responsive to nutritional interventions, but fat mass did not vary. There were no qualitative reviews identified.
Although effective interventions for weight gain and weight loss to optimize body composition of older people in the community were identified,making long term, clinically relevant changes in body composition is difficult. Multiple interventions are more effective than single interventions.
优化社区老年人的身体组成以实现健康老龄化是一项重大挑战。有多种潜在干预措施可供老年人使用,以支持体重增加(针对体重过轻的人)和体重减轻(针对超重或肥胖的人)。虽然体重过轻的人体重增加的益处通常有明确界定,但超重或肥胖的人体重减轻的价值却不太明确,尤其是对于老年人。
本综合性综述旨在衡量营养干预措施对优化社区老年人健康身体组成的有效性,并探讨他们的定性认知。
纳入标准 参与者类型:参与者为60岁及以上居住在社区的老年人。
该综述考察了六种营养干预措施:(i)饮食方案,(ii)营养补充剂,(iii)代餐,(iv)食物类别,(v)送餐支持与饮食行为,以及(vi)营养咨询或教育。
本综合性综述考虑了任何关于有效性的定量系统评价和荟萃分析、定性系统评价或两者结合(即综合性综述)。
身体组成的定量结果指标为:(i)营养状况(如超重或体重过轻患者的比例);(ii)脂肪量(千克),(iii)去脂体重或肌肉量(千克),(iv)体重(千克)或体重指数(千克/米²),(v)骨量(千克)或骨测量指标如骨矿物质密度,以及(vi)水合状态。
关注的现象是参与者的定性认知和经历。
我们为九个文献计量数据库和灰色文献制定了迭代检索策略。
使用标准的乔安娜·布里格斯研究所工具,由两人独立对13项研究进行批判性评价。确定了六项中等质量和七项高质量研究。
使用标准的乔安娜·布里格斯研究所数据提取工具,由两人独立从所有13项纳入研究中提取数据。
仅纳入了有效性的定量研究。使用交通灯系统(绿色、琥珀色、红色)对评估干预措施有效性的证据强度进行分级。对每个比较的证据质量进行了总体评估。
纳入的调查体重增加的系统评价比调查体重减轻的更多。关于体重增加的研究表明,单独使用口服营养补充剂、口服营养补充剂与抗阻运动训练相结合、口服营养补充剂与营养咨询相结合均能改善身体组成。关于体重减轻的研究表明,饮食与运动相结合、饮食与运动及营养咨询相结合、单独的营养咨询均能使老年人体重减轻。去脂体重和体重/体重指数的结果对营养干预有反应,但脂肪量没有变化。未发现定性综述。
虽然确定了有效干预措施可增加或减轻体重以优化社区老年人的身体组成,但要在身体组成方面做出长期的、具有临床相关性的改变却很困难。多种干预措施比单一干预措施更有效。