Suppr超能文献

针对低风险与中风险前列腺癌男性患者在主动监测期间检测Gleason评分升级的靶向活检。

Targeted Biopsy to Detect Gleason Score Upgrading during Active Surveillance for Men with Low versus Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.

作者信息

Nassiri Nima, Margolis Daniel J, Natarajan Shyam, Sharma Devi S, Huang Jiaoti, Dorey Frederick J, Marks Leonard S

机构信息

Department of Urology (NN, SN, DSS, LSM), University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiology (DJM), University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Biomedical Engineering (SN), University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine (JH), Durham, North Carolina.

Department of Urology (NN, SN, DSS, LSM), University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Radiology (DJM), University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Biomedical Engineering (SN), University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine (JH), Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):632-639. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.070. Epub 2016 Sep 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We sought to determine the rate of upgrading to Gleason score 4 + 3 or greater using targeted biopsy for diagnosis and monitoring in men undergoing active surveillance of prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study subjects comprised all 259 men, including 196 with Gleason score 3 + 3 and 63 with Gleason score 3 + 4, who were diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided biopsy from 2009 to 2015 and underwent subsequent fusion biopsy for as long as 4 years of active surveillance. The primary end point was the discovery of Gleason score 4 + 3 or greater prostate cancer. Followup biopsies included targeting of positive sites, which were tracked in an Artemis™ device. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to determine upgrading rates, stratified by initial Gleason score and prostate specific antigen density.

RESULTS

Based on a Cox proportional hazard model, men with Gleason score 3 + 4 were 4.65 times more likely to have upgrading than men with an initial Gleason score of 3 + 3 at 3 years (p <0.01). By the third surveillance year 63% of men with Gleason score 3 + 4 had been upgraded compared with 18.0% who started with Gleason score 3 + 3 (p <0.01). Of all 33 upgrades 32 (97%) occurred at a magnetic resonance imaging visible or a tracked site of tumor, rather than at a previously negative systematic site. Independent predictors of upgrading were Gleason score 3 + 4, prostate specific antigen density 0.15 ng/ml/cm or greater and a grade 5 lesion on magnetic resonance imaging. The incidence rate ratio of upgrading (Gleason score 3 + 4 vs 3 + 3) was 4.25 per year of patient followup (p <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

During active surveillance of prostate cancer, targeting of tracked tumor foci by magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy allows for heightened detection of Gleason score 4 + 3 or greater cancers. Baseline variables directly related to important upgrading that warrant increased vigilance include Gleason score 3 + 4, prostate specific antigen density 0.15 ng/ml/cm or greater and grade 5 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging.

摘要

目的

我们试图确定在接受前列腺癌主动监测的男性中,使用靶向活检进行诊断和监测时,升级为Gleason评分4+3或更高的比例。

材料与方法

研究对象包括2009年至2015年通过磁共振成像/超声融合引导活检确诊的所有259名男性,其中196名Gleason评分为3+3,63名Gleason评分为3+4,并在长达4年的主动监测期间接受了后续融合活检。主要终点是发现Gleason评分4+3或更高的前列腺癌。随访活检包括对阳性部位进行靶向活检,这些部位在Artemis™设备中进行跟踪。生成Kaplan-Meier曲线以确定升级率,并按初始Gleason评分和前列腺特异性抗原密度进行分层。

结果

基于Cox比例风险模型,在3年时,Gleason评分为3+4的男性升级的可能性是初始Gleason评分为3+3的男性的4.65倍(p<0.01)。到第三个监测年,63%的Gleason评分为3+4的男性发生了升级,而初始Gleason评分为3+3的男性中这一比例为18.0%(p<0.01)。在所有33例升级病例中,32例(97%)发生在磁共振成像可见或跟踪的肿瘤部位,而不是在先前为阴性的系统部位。升级的独立预测因素包括Gleason评分为3+4、前列腺特异性抗原密度为0.15 ng/ml/cm或更高以及磁共振成像上的5级病变。患者随访每年升级的发病率比(Gleason评分3+4与3+3相比)为4.25(p<0.01)。

结论

在前列腺癌主动监测期间,通过磁共振成像/超声融合活检对跟踪的肿瘤病灶进行靶向活检,能够提高对Gleason评分4+3或更高癌症的检测率。与重要升级直接相关且需要提高警惕的基线变量包括Gleason评分为3+4、前列腺特异性抗原密度为0.15 ng/ml/cm或更高以及磁共振成像上的5级病变。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Contemporary Review of Multimodality Imaging of the Prostate Gland.前列腺多模态成像的当代综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 26;13(11):1860. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111860.

本文引用的文献

5
Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2016.前列腺癌临床实践指南(2016 年版)
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jan;14(1):19-30. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验