Thierry Guillaume
School of Psychology and Centre for Research on Bilingualism Bangor University.
Lang Learn. 2016 Sep;66(3):690-713. doi: 10.1111/lang.12186. Epub 2016 Jun 19.
The time has come, perhaps, to go beyond merely acknowledging that language is a core manifestation of the workings of the human mind and that it relates interactively to all aspects of thinking. The issue, thus, is not to decide whether language and human thought may be ineluctably linked (they just are), but rather to determine what the characteristics of this relationship may be and to understand how language influences-and may be influenced by-nonverbal information processing. In an attempt to demystify linguistic relativity, I review neurolinguistic studies from our research group showing a link between linguistic distinctions and perceptual or conceptual processing. On the basis of empirical evidence showing effects of terminology on perception, language-idiosyncratic relationships in semantic memory, grammatical skewing of event conceptualization, and unconscious modulation of executive functioning by verbal input, I advocate a neurofunctional approach through which we can systematically explore how languages shape human thought.
或许,现在是时候不仅仅满足于承认语言是人类思维运作的核心表现,且它与思维的各个方面相互作用地联系在一起了。因此,问题不在于判定语言与人类思维是否必然相连(它们肯定是相连的),而在于确定这种关系的特征是什么,并理解语言如何影响——以及可能如何被非语言信息处理所影响。为了揭开语言相对论的神秘面纱,我回顾了我们研究小组的神经语言学研究,这些研究表明语言差异与感知或概念处理之间存在联系。基于显示术语对感知的影响、语义记忆中语言特有的关系、事件概念化的语法倾向以及言语输入对执行功能的无意识调节的实证证据,我提倡一种神经功能方法,通过这种方法我们可以系统地探究语言如何塑造人类思维。