• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新加坡乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的障碍:一项混合方法分析。

Barriers to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Singapore: a Mixed Methods Analysis.

作者信息

Malhotra Chetna, Bilger Marcel, Liu Joy, Finkelstein Eric

机构信息

Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore E-mail :

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(8):3887-95.

PMID:27644635
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In order to increase breast and cervical cancer screening uptake in Singapore, women's perceived barriers to screening need to be identified and overcome. Using data from both focus groups and surveys, we aimed to assess perceived barriers and motivations for breast and cervical cancer screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted 8 focus groups with 64 women, using thematic analysis to identify overarching themes related to women's attitudes towards screening. Based on recurring themes from focus groups, several hypotheses regarding potential barriers and motivations to screen were generated and tested through a national survey of 801 women aged 25-64.

RESULTS

Focus group participants had misconceptions related to screening, believing that the procedures were painful. Cost was an issue, as well as efficacy and fatalism.

CONCLUSIONS

By identifying barriers to and motivators for screening through a mixed-method design that has both nuance and external validity, this study offers valuable suggestions to policymakers to improve breast and cervical cancer screening uptake in Singapore.

摘要

背景

为了提高新加坡乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的参与率,需要识别并克服女性在筛查方面所感知到的障碍。利用焦点小组和调查的数据,我们旨在评估乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的感知障碍及动机。

材料与方法

我们与64名女性进行了8次焦点小组讨论,采用主题分析来确定与女性对筛查态度相关的总体主题。基于焦点小组中反复出现的主题,我们提出了几个关于筛查潜在障碍和动机的假设,并通过对801名年龄在25至64岁之间的女性进行全国性调查来进行检验。

结果

焦点小组参与者对筛查存在误解,认为检查过程很痛苦。成本是一个问题,疗效和宿命论也是如此。

结论

通过采用兼具细微差别和外部有效性的混合方法设计来识别筛查的障碍和动机,本研究为政策制定者提供了有价值的建议,以提高新加坡乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的参与率。

相似文献

1
Barriers to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Singapore: a Mixed Methods Analysis.新加坡乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的障碍:一项混合方法分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(8):3887-95.
2
Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.科罗拉多州医疗专业人员对西班牙裔女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的态度。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995(18):95-100.
3
Demand for Cancer Screening Services: Results From Randomized Controlled Discrete Choice Experiments.癌症筛查服务需求:随机对照离散选择实验结果。
Value Health. 2020 Sep;23(9):1246-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.06.004. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
4
Assessment of psychological barriers to cervical cancer screening among women in Kumasi, Ghana using a mixed methods approach.采用混合方法评估加纳库马西女性宫颈癌筛查的心理障碍。
Afr Health Sci. 2013 Dec;13(4):1054-61. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v13i4.28.
5
Knowledge, Attitudes and Behavior of Bangkok Metropolitan Women Regarding Cervical Cancer Screening.曼谷都市女性对宫颈癌筛查的认知、态度和行为
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(3):945-52. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.3.945.
6
Attitudes toward self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among primary care attendees living on the US-Mexico border.居住在美国-墨西哥边境的初级保健就诊者对宫颈癌筛查自我采样的态度。
South Med J. 2014 Jul;107(7):426-32. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000132.
7
Screening for breast and cervical cancer in a large German city: participation, motivation and knowledge of risk factors.德国一个大城市的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查:参与情况、动机及对风险因素的认知
Eur J Public Health. 2005 Feb;15(1):70-7. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki118.
8
Latina Women and Cervical Cancer Screening: Decisional Balance and Self-Efficacy.拉丁裔女性与宫颈癌筛查:决策平衡与自我效能感
Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Jun 1;20(3):E71-6. doi: 10.1188/16.CJON.E71-E76.
9
How can young women be encouraged to attend cervical cancer screening? Suggestions from face-to-face and internet focus group discussions with 30-year-old women in Stockholm, Sweden.如何鼓励年轻女性接受宫颈癌筛查?对瑞典斯德哥尔摩 30 岁女性进行面对面和网络焦点小组讨论的建议。
Acta Oncol. 2011 Jan;50(1):112-20. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.528790. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
10
A qualitative exploration of cervical and breast cancer stigma in Karnataka, India.印度卡纳塔克邦宫颈癌和乳腺癌污名化的定性探索。
BMC Womens Health. 2017 Aug 2;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0407-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Preventive behaviors of COVID-19 during the COVID-19 pandemic among community-dwelling older adults in Thailand.泰国社区居住老年人在新冠疫情期间的新冠病毒预防行为
PeerJ. 2025 May 13;13:e19412. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19412. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of personalised risk predictions on breast cancer risk perceptions: insights from the BREATHE study.个性化风险预测对乳腺癌风险认知的影响:BREATHE研究的见解
J Transl Med. 2025 May 8;23(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06515-1.
3
Do women with a history of breast cancer recommend risk-based breast cancer screening? An in-depth interview study.
有乳腺癌病史的女性会推荐基于风险的乳腺癌筛查吗?一项深入访谈研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 22;16:1414099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1414099. eCollection 2025.
4
Facilitators and Barriers to Cancer Screening Participation Across Southeastic Asia: A Scoping Review.东南亚地区癌症筛查参与的促进因素和障碍:一项范围综述
Psychooncology. 2025 Apr;34(4):e70139. doi: 10.1002/pon.70139.
5
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
6
Spousal perceptions and their role in promoting breast cancer screening: a focus group study.配偶的认知及其在促进乳腺癌筛查中的作用:一项焦点小组研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 12;15(3):e086340. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086340.
7
Exploring Factors Influencing Cervical Cancer Screening Participation among Singaporean Women: A Social Ecological Approach.探索影响新加坡女性宫颈癌筛查参与率的因素:一种社会生态方法。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;16(20):3475. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203475.
8
Breast cancer screening motivation among women: an application of self-determination theory.乳腺癌筛查动机在女性中的应用:自我决定理论。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Sep 16;25(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02594-z.
9
Understanding Barriers and Facilitators of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening among Singapore Women: A Qualitative Approach.了解新加坡女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:一种定性方法。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):889-895. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.889.
10
Disparities in access to cancer diagnostics in ASEAN member countries.东盟成员国在癌症诊断可及性方面的差异。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 Jan 6;32:100667. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100667. eCollection 2023 Mar.