Proverbio Daniela, Spada Eva, de Giorgi Giada Bagnagatti, Perego And Roberta
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Milan, Via Celoria 10, 20133 Milan, Italy.
Vet World. 2016 Aug;9(8):904-8. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2016.904-908. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in proteinuria in dogs naturally infected with visceral leishmaniasis, following treatment with miltefosine (MLF) and allopurinol.
Medical records of 40 dogs with leishmaniasis, treated with 2 mg/kg MLF every 24 h PO and 10 mg/kg allopurinol every 12 h for 28 days were reviewed. 20 dogs were included in the study, and clinical staging was performed following guidelines of the Canine leishmaniasis (CanL) Working Group, and dogs were categorized for proteinuria according to the International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) staging system. Clinical score, indirect fluorescent antibody test titer, serum total protein, gamma globulin (IgG), serum creatinine and urea concentration, and urine protein creatinine ratio (UP/C) were recorded at the time of diagnosis before the start of therapy (D0) and at the end of 28 days of therapy (D28).
Following the CanL Working Group staging, all 20 dogs were classified as the clinical Stage C (Clinical disease) before and after the cycle of treatment. Before the cycle of therapy, dogs were categorized according to the IRIS staging system, as: 9/20 non-proteinuric (NP), 7/20 borderline proteinuric (BP), and 4/20 proteinuric (P). After treatment, 12/20 dogs were NP, 7/20 were BP, and 1/20 was P. There was a significant change in UP/C values before and after one cycle of treatment with MLF. In detail, after 28 days of therapy, 2 of 9 NP dogs became BP, 3 of the 7 BP dogs became NP, and 2 of the 4 P dogs became NP.
This study showed a significant decrease in UP/C values occurred after one cycle of treatment with MLF and allopurinol in dogs naturally affected with CanL. This suggests that MLF does not increase proteinuria, and the use of MLF could be considered for the management of dogs with leishmaniasis, particularly in those with impaired renal function at the time of diagnosis.
本研究旨在评估用米替福新(MLF)和别嘌呤醇治疗自然感染内脏利什曼病的犬蛋白尿的变化。
回顾了40只利什曼病犬的病历,这些犬每24小时口服2mg/kg MLF,每12小时口服10mg/kg别嘌呤醇,持续28天。20只犬纳入研究,按照犬利什曼病(CanL)工作组的指南进行临床分期,并根据国际肾脏兴趣协会(IRIS)分期系统对犬的蛋白尿进行分类。在治疗开始前诊断时(D0)和治疗28天结束时(D28)记录临床评分、间接荧光抗体试验滴度、血清总蛋白、γ球蛋白(IgG)、血清肌酐和尿素浓度以及尿蛋白肌酐比值(UP/C)。
按照CanL工作组分期,所有20只犬在治疗周期前后均被分类为临床C期(临床疾病)。在治疗周期前,根据IRIS分期系统,犬被分类为:9/20非蛋白尿(NP),7/20临界蛋白尿(BP),4/20蛋白尿(P)。治疗后,20只犬中有12只为NP,7只为BP,1只为P。用MLF治疗一个周期前后UP/C值有显著变化。详细而言,治疗28天后,9只NP犬中有2只变为BP,7只BP犬中有3只变为NP,4只P犬中有2只变为NP。
本研究表明,自然感染CanL的犬用MLF和别嘌呤醇治疗一个周期后,UP/C值显著降低。这表明MLF不会增加蛋白尿,对于利什曼病犬的管理,尤其是诊断时肾功能受损的犬,可考虑使用MLF。