• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短期记忆的功能决定因素:来自言语序列回忆中感知运动干扰的证据。

The functional determinants of short-term memory: Evidence from perceptual-motor interference in verbal serial recall.

作者信息

Hughes Robert W, Marsh John E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London.

School of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(4):537-551. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000325. Epub 2016 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000325
PMID:27668482
Abstract

A functional, perceptual-motor, account of serial short-term memory (STM) is examined by investigating the way in which an irrelevant spoken sequence interferes with verbal serial recall. Even with visual list-presentation, verbal serial recall is particularly susceptible to disruption by irrelevant spoken stimuli that have the same identity as-but that are order-incongruent with-the to-be-remembered items. We test the view that such interference is because of the obligatory perceptual organization of the spoken stimuli yielding a sequence that competes with a subvocal motor-plan assembled to support the reproduction of the to-be-remembered list. In support of this view, the interference can be eliminated without changing either the identities or objective serial order of the spoken stimuli but merely by promoting a subjective perceptual organization that strips them of their order-incongruent relation to the to-be-remembered list (Experiment 1). The interference is also eliminated if subvocal motor sequence-planning is impeded via articulatory suppression (Experiment 2). The results are in line with the view that performance-limits in verbal serial STM are because of having to exploit perceptual and motor processes for purposes for which they did not evolve, not the inherently limited capacity of structures or mechanisms dedicated to storage. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

通过研究无关言语序列干扰言语序列回忆的方式,对系列短时记忆(STM)的一种功能性、感知运动性解释进行了考察。即使是在视觉呈现列表的情况下,言语序列回忆也特别容易受到无关言语刺激的干扰,这些刺激与要记忆的项目具有相同的特性,但顺序不一致。我们检验了这样一种观点,即这种干扰是由于言语刺激的强制性感知组织产生了一个与为支持要记忆列表的再现而组装的默读运动计划相竞争的序列。支持这一观点的是,无需改变言语刺激的特性或客观序列顺序,而只需促进一种主观感知组织,消除它们与要记忆列表的顺序不一致关系,就能消除干扰(实验1)。如果通过发音抑制阻碍默读运动序列计划,干扰也会消除(实验2)。结果符合这样一种观点,即言语系列STM中的表现限制是由于必须将感知和运动过程用于它们并非为此而进化的目的,而不是由于专门用于存储的结构或机制的固有容量有限。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
The functional determinants of short-term memory: Evidence from perceptual-motor interference in verbal serial recall.短期记忆的功能决定因素:来自言语序列回忆中感知运动干扰的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Apr;43(4):537-551. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000325. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
2
The articulatory determinants of verbal sequence learning.言语序列学习的发音决定因素。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Oct;46(10):1977-1997. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000926. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
3
When is forewarned forearmed? Predicting auditory distraction in short-term memory.有备则无患?预测短期记忆中的听觉干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Mar;46(3):427-442. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000736. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
4
A comparison of serial order short-term memory effects across verbal and musical domains.言语和音乐领域中序列顺序短期记忆效应的比较。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Apr;46(3):464-481. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0778-0.
5
Serial reconstruction of order and serial recall in verbal short-term memory.言语短期记忆中顺序的序列重建与序列回忆
Mem Cognit. 2017 Oct;45(7):1126-1143. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0719-y.
6
Synchronized brain activity during rehearsal and short-term memory disruption by irrelevant speech is affected by recall mode.排练期间的同步大脑活动以及无关言语对短期记忆的干扰受回忆模式的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Aug;61(2):188-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.10.001. Epub 2005 Nov 17.
7
Serial recall of colors: Two models of memory for serial order applied to continuous visual stimuli.颜色的系列回忆:两种应用于连续视觉刺激的系列顺序记忆模型。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jan;46(1):1-16. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0741-0.
8
Modality independence of order coding in working memory: Evidence from cross-modal order interference at recall.工作记忆中顺序编码的模态独立性:来自回忆时跨模态顺序干扰的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(1):161-79. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1032987. Epub 2015 May 12.
9
Forward and backward recall of serial actions: Exploring the temporal dynamics of working memory for instruction.连续动作的前后回忆:探索指令工作记忆的时间动态。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Feb;47(2):279-291. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0865-x.
10
The effect of selective attention and a stimulus prefix on the output order of immediate free recall of short and long lists.选择性注意和刺激前缀对长短列表即时自由回忆输出顺序的影响。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2015 Mar;69(1):1-16. doi: 10.1037/cep0000045.

引用本文的文献

1
Is Recognition of Speech in Noise Related to Memory Disruption Caused by Irrelevant Sound?噪声中言语识别与无关声音引起的记忆干扰有关吗?
Trends Hear. 2024 Jan-Dec;28:23312165241262517. doi: 10.1177/23312165241262517.
2
The phonological store of working memory: A critique and an alternative, perceptual-motor, approach to verbal short-term memory.工作记忆的语音存储:一种批判以及对言语短期记忆的一种替代性的、感知运动的方法。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Feb;78(2):240-263. doi: 10.1177/17470218241257885. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
3
Irrelevant speech, changing state, and order information.
无关言语、改变状态和顺序信息。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Nov;51(8):1836-1848. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01437-z. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
4
Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.任务特异性听觉分心对系列回忆和心算的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2023 May;51(4):930-951. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01363-6. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
5
Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.无关言语会损害儿童和成人言语序列回忆,但不会损害空间项目。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Feb;51(2):307-320. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01359-2. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
6
Evidence Against Novelty-Gated Encoding in Serial Recall.反对序列回忆中新颖性门控编码的证据。
J Cogn. 2022 Feb 8;5(1):17. doi: 10.5334/joc.207. eCollection 2022.
7
Transfer of working memory training to the inhibitory control of auditory distraction.工作记忆训练向听觉分心抑制控制的转移。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):3152-3166. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01468-0. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
8
Metacognition in Auditory Distraction: How Expectations about Distractibility Influence the Irrelevant Sound Effect.听觉分心任务中的元认知:关于分心可能性的预期如何影响无关声音效应。
J Cogn. 2017 Nov 30;1(1):2. doi: 10.5334/joc.3.
9
How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.视觉注意力的部署如何调节听觉干扰。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jan;82(1):350-362. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01800-w.
10
Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.无关声音效应与后缀效应之间的相似性。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):841-848. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0806-8.