Suppr超能文献

发酵纤维补充剂在通便效果上并不比安慰剂更好。

Fermented Fiber Supplements Are No Better Than Placebo for a Laxative Effect.

作者信息

McRorie Johnson W, Chey William D

机构信息

Global Clinical Sciences, Procter & Gamble, Mason Business Center, 8700 Mason-Montgomery Road, Mason, OH, 45040, USA.

University of Michigan Health System, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Nov;61(11):3140-3146. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4304-1. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Misconceptions about the effects of dietary fiber and 'functional' fiber on stool parameters and constipation persist in the literature.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted with the use of the Scopus and PubMed scientific databases to identify and objectively assess well-controlled clinical studies that evaluated the effects of fiber on stool parameters and constipation.

RESULTS

The totality of well-controlled randomized clinical studies show that, to exert a laxative effect, fiber must: (1) resist fermentation to remain intact throughout the large bowel and present in stool, and (2) significantly increase stool water content and stool output, resulting in soft/bulky/easy-to-pass stools. Poorly fermented insoluble fiber (e.g., wheat bran) remains as discreet particles which can mechanically irritate the gut mucosa, stimulating water & mucous secretion if the particles are sufficiently large/coarse. For soluble fibers, some have no effect on viscosity (e.g., inulin, wheat dextrin) while others form high viscosity gels (e.g., β-glucan, psyllium). If the soluble fiber is readily fermented, whether non-viscous or gel-forming, it has no effect on stool output or stool water content, and has no laxative effect. In contrast, a non-fermented, gel-forming soluble fiber (e.g., psyllium) retains its gelled nature and high water-holding capacity throughout the large bowel, resulting in soft/bulky/easy-to-pass stools.

CONCLUSION

When considering a recommendation for a fiber supplement regimen to treat and/or prevent constipation, it is important to consider which fibers have the physical characteristics to exert a laxative effect, and which fiber supplements have rigorous clinical evidence of a significant benefit in patients with constipation.

摘要

背景

关于膳食纤维和“功能性”纤维对粪便参数及便秘影响的误解在文献中依然存在。

方法

利用Scopus和PubMed科学数据库进行全面的文献综述,以识别并客观评估评估纤维对粪便参数及便秘影响的严格对照的临床研究。

结果

所有严格对照的随机临床研究表明,要发挥通便作用,纤维必须:(1)抵抗发酵,在整个大肠中保持完整并存在于粪便中;(2)显著增加粪便含水量和粪便排出量,从而产生软/体积大/易排出的粪便。发酵程度低的不溶性纤维(如麦麸)以离散颗粒形式存在,若颗粒足够大/粗糙,可机械性刺激肠黏膜,刺激水和黏液分泌。对于可溶性纤维,有些对黏度无影响(如菊粉、小麦糊精),而有些则形成高黏度凝胶(如β-葡聚糖、洋车前子壳)。如果可溶性纤维易于发酵,无论是否形成凝胶,它对粪便排出量或粪便含水量均无影响,也无通便作用。相反,一种未发酵、形成凝胶的可溶性纤维(如洋车前子壳)在整个大肠中保持其凝胶性质和高持水能力,从而产生软/体积大/易排出的粪便。结论:在考虑推荐纤维补充方案以治疗和/或预防便秘时,重要的是要考虑哪些纤维具有发挥通便作用的物理特性,以及哪些纤维补充剂有严格的临床证据表明对便秘患者有显著益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验