Heise Tim, Zijlstra Eric, Nosek Leszek, Rikte Tord, Haahr Hanne
Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Neuss, Germany.
Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017 Feb;19(2):208-215. doi: 10.1111/dom.12803. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
To evaluate the pharmacological characteristics of faster-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) compared with insulin aspart (IAsp) during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).
In this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, 48 men and women aged 18 to 64 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) received faster aspart and IAsp as a 0.15 U/kg bolus dose via CSII, on top of a basal rate (0.02 U/kg/h), in a glucose clamp setting (target 5.5 mmol/L).
After a CSII bolus dose, the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles for faster aspart were left-shifted compared with those for IAsp. For faster aspart vs IAsp, the early glucose-lowering effect (area under the curve for glucose infusion rate [GIR] ) was approximately 2-fold higher (least squares means 24.9 vs 11.4 mg/kg; estimated ratio faster aspart/IAsp 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.33; 5.04]; P = .002), onset of glucose-lowering effect (time to early 50% of maximum GIR) occurred 11.1 minutes earlier (41.1 vs 52.3 minutes; 95% CI faster aspart - IAsp [-15.4; -6.9]; P<.001), and offset of glucose-lowering effect (time to late 50% of maximum GIR) occurred 24.0 minutes earlier (214.7 vs 238.7 minutes; 95% CI [-38.9; -9.1]; P=.002). Likewise, significantly greater early exposure and significantly earlier onset and offset of exposure were observed for faster aspart vs IAsp. Faster aspart and IAsp were both well tolerated.
In patients with T1DM using CSII, faster aspart better mimics the endogenous prandial insulin secretion and action than does IAsp. Faster aspart therefore has the potential to provide clinical benefits over current rapid-acting insulins in the insulin pump setting.
在持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)期间,评估速效门冬胰岛素(faster aspart)相较于门冬胰岛素(IAsp)的药理学特性。
在这项随机、双盲、交叉试验中,48名年龄在18至64岁的1型糖尿病(T1DM)男性和女性,在葡萄糖钳夹设置(目标值5.5 mmol/L)下,于基础输注速率(0.02 U/kg/h)之上,通过CSII接受faster aspart和IAsp作为0.15 U/kg的静脉推注剂量。
CSII静脉推注剂量后,faster aspart的药代动力学/药效学曲线相较于IAsp向左偏移。与IAsp相比,faster aspart的早期降糖效果(葡萄糖输注速率曲线下面积[GIR])约高2倍(最小二乘均值分别为24.9和11.4 mg/kg;faster aspart与IAsp的估计比值为2.18,95%置信区间[CI][1.33; 5.04];P = 0.002),降糖效果起效时间(达到最大GIR的早期50%的时间)提前11.1分钟(分别为41.1和52.3分钟;faster aspart与IAsp的95% CI [-15.4; -6.9];P<0.001),降糖效果消退时间(达到最大GIR晚期50%的时间)提前24.0分钟(分别为214.7和238.7分钟;95% CI [-38.9; -9.1];P = 0.002)。同样,相较于IAsp,faster aspart的早期暴露量显著更高,暴露的起效和消退时间也显著更早。faster aspart和IAsp的耐受性均良好。
在使用CSII的T1DM患者中,faster aspart比IAsp能更好地模拟内源性餐时胰岛素分泌及作用。因此,在胰岛素泵治疗中,faster aspart相较于目前的速效胰岛素可能具有临床优势。