Suppr超能文献

德国459名急救医生的应激应对方式:一项试点研究。

Stress-coping styles of 459 emergency care physicians in Germany : A pilot study.

作者信息

Sand M, Hessam S, Sand D, Bechara F G, Vorstius C, Bromba M, Stockfleth E, Shiue I

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, St. Josef Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791, Bochum, Germany.

Department of Plastic Surgery, St. Josef Hospital, Catholic Clinics of the Ruhr Peninsula, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 2016 Nov;65(11):841-846. doi: 10.1007/s00101-016-0228-6. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

Abstract

AIM

In addition to assessing stress-coping strategies in patients, equal attention should be paid to health-care professionals. The literature on the stress-coping strategies of emergency physicians - health-care professionals who are frequently subject to stress in a fast-paced clinical setting - is scant. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the stress-coping strategies of emergency-care physicians (ECPs) in Germany.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study by approaching German Associations of Emergency Medicine Physicians and the two largest ECP recruitment agencies in Germany to invite their members to participate. We used the German Stress Coping Strategies Inventory ("Stressverarbeitungsfragebogen" SVF-78) to generate stress-coping scores that would cover both positive and negative strategies. Differences according to sex were also examined. Analyses including chi-square test, t test, and multinomial logistic regression modeling were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 459 German ECPs were included in the study. Compared with men, women tended to have negative coping strategies (beta = 1.77, p < 0.001). Specifically, women tended to use social support (beta = 1.55, p = 0.002), avoidance (beta = 2.59, p < 0.001), escape (beta = 1.39, p = 0.004), rumination (beta = 1.58, p < 0.001), and resignation (beta = 2.09, p < 0.001), while being less likely than men to rely on minimization and denial of guilt.

CONCLUSION

ECPs experience stress in the same manner as patients and other professionals, and they must address and cope with stress appropriately. For future research, studies with a longitudinal approach to monitor the underlying mechanisms are suggested. For clinical practice and policy-making, structural changes in work patterns and psychological support should be considered, which may be of particular benefit for female ECPs.

摘要

目的

除了评估患者的压力应对策略外,还应同等关注医护人员。关于急诊医生(即在快节奏临床环境中经常承受压力的医护人员)压力应对策略的文献很少。因此,我们旨在调查德国急诊护理医生(ECP)的压力应对策略。

方法

我们通过联系德国急诊医学医师协会以及德国两家最大的ECP招聘机构,邀请其成员参与,进行了一项横断面研究。我们使用德国压力应对策略量表(“Stressverarbeitungsfragebogen”SVF - 78)来生成涵盖积极和消极策略的压力应对得分。还检查了性别差异。进行了包括卡方检验、t检验和多项逻辑回归建模在内的分析。

结果

共有459名德国ECP纳入研究。与男性相比,女性倾向于采用消极应对策略(β = 1.77,p < 0.001)。具体而言,女性倾向于使用社会支持(β = 1.55,p = 0.002)、回避(β = 2.59,p < 0.001)、逃避(β = 1.39,p = 0.004)、沉思(β = 1.58,p < 0.001)和听天由命(β = 2.09,p < 0.001),而比男性更不太可能依赖淡化和否认内疚感。

结论

ECP与患者及其他专业人员经历压力的方式相同,他们必须适当地应对压力。对于未来的研究,建议采用纵向研究方法来监测潜在机制。对于临床实践和政策制定,应考虑工作模式的结构性变化和心理支持,这可能对女性ECP特别有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验