Ilić Ivana M, Arandjelović Mirjana Ž, Jovanović Jovica M, Nešić Milkica M
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Niš, Niš, Serbia.
University of Niš, Niš, Serbia (Faculty of Medicine).
Med Pr. 2017 Mar 24;68(2):167-178. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00516. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
Psychosocial risks represent a great challenge for safety and health protection at work in Europe. The purpose of this study has been to determine the relationships of psychosocial risks arising from work, stress, personal characteristics and burnout among physicians and nurses in the Emergency Medical Service (EMS).
We performed a cross-sectional study based on a questionnaire survey which contained the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) and Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI).
A total of 88 physicians and 80 nurses completed the survey. Physicians demonstrated higher emotional (mean (M) ± standard deviation (SD) = 74.57±16.85) and cognitive (M±SD = 75.95±13.74) demands as compared to nurses. Both groups had high sensory demands and responsibilities at work, in spite of the low degree of their autonomy. The meaning of work, commitment to the workplace, and insecurity at work were high for both groups. Among all participants, stressful behavior and reactions were within the limits of low values (< 40) and coping strategies showed high values (> 60). Personal and patient-related burnout was high for both groups, where physicians were significantly affected by work-related burnout. The influence at work, degree of freedom at work, social support, sense of coherence, mental health, and problem-focused coping are negatively related to work-related burnout.
Based on personal factors and coping styles, emergency physicians and nurses are representing a self-selective professional group that meets high work demands, great responsibility, strong commitment and insecurity at work. Burnout of physicians and nurses in the EMS tends to be ignored, although it has severe consequences on their mental and general health. Med Pr 2017;68(2):178-178.
社会心理风险对欧洲工作场所的安全与健康保护构成了巨大挑战。本研究的目的是确定紧急医疗服务(EMS)中的医生和护士因工作产生的社会心理风险、压力、个人特征与职业倦怠之间的关系。
我们基于一项问卷调查开展了一项横断面研究,该问卷包含哥本哈根社会心理问卷(COPSOQ)和哥本哈根倦怠量表(CBI)。
共有88名医生和80名护士完成了调查。与护士相比,医生表现出更高的情感需求(均值(M)±标准差(SD)=74.57±16.85)和认知需求(M±SD = 75.95±13.74)。尽管两组的工作自主性较低,但他们在工作中的感官需求和职责都很高。两组的工作意义、对工作场所的投入度和工作中的不安全感都很高。在所有参与者中,压力行为和反应处于低水平(<40)范围内,应对策略则表现出高水平(>60)。两组的个人和与患者相关的职业倦怠程度都很高,其中医生受工作相关职业倦怠的影响尤为显著。工作影响力、工作自由度、社会支持、连贯感、心理健康和以问题为导向的应对方式与工作相关职业倦怠呈负相关。
基于个人因素和应对方式,急诊医生和护士是一个自我选择的职业群体,他们面临着高工作需求、重大责任、强烈的投入度和工作中的不安全感。尽管EMS中医生和护士的职业倦怠对他们的心理和整体健康有严重影响,但往往被忽视。《医学实践》2017年;68(2):178 - 178。