• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

元控制与联合行动:共享目标如何从一项任务转移到另一项任务?

Metacontrol and joint action: how shared goals transfer from one task to another?

机构信息

Department of General Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Germany.

Institute of Psychology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2769-2781. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01443-9. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-020-01443-9
PMID:33225385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8440260/
Abstract

In most of our daily activities and in team sports, we interact with other individuals and do not act in isolation. Using a social variant of the standard two-choice Simon task, this study aims to test if competitive/cooperative processing modes (i.e., metacontrol states) change the degree of bodily self-other integration between two persons in joint action. In addition, and more exploratory the study tested if this effect depends on a shared group experience with the partner. Two participants shared a visual Simon task, so that each person basically performed complementary parts of the task, which transfers the paradigm into a go/no-go Simon task for each person. Before running this joint Simon task, we set both participants either in a competitive or a cooperative control state by means of a dyadic game, a manipulation aimed at testing possible goal transfer across tasks. We found significant joint Simon effects for participants who were in a competitive state and for participants who were in a cooperative state. The joint Simon effect for participants being in a competitive state was significantly smaller than for participants being in a cooperative state. When experiencing the goal induction together with the partner, the joint Simon effect was significantly decreased as when the induction was performed alone. Both effects (metacontrol state induction and shared experience) seem to be statistically independent of each other. In line with predictions of metacontrol state theory, our study indicated that abstract cognitive goal states can be transferred from one task to another task, able to affect the degree of bodily self-other integration across different task situations.

摘要

在我们的大多数日常活动和团队运动中,我们与他人互动,而不是孤立地行动。本研究采用社会版标准二择一 Simon 任务,旨在检验竞争/合作加工模式(即元控制状态)是否会改变两人在联合动作中的身体自我-他人整合程度。此外,更具探索性的是,该研究还测试了这种效应是否取决于与伴侣的共同群体经验。两名参与者共享视觉 Simon 任务,因此每个人基本上执行任务的互补部分,这将范式转化为每个人的 Go/No-Go Simon 任务。在运行这个联合 Simon 任务之前,我们通过二元游戏将两个参与者设定在竞争或合作控制状态,这种操纵旨在测试任务之间可能的目标转移。我们发现,处于竞争状态的参与者和处于合作状态的参与者都存在显著的联合 Simon 效应。处于竞争状态的参与者的联合 Simon 效应明显小于处于合作状态的参与者。当与伙伴一起体验目标诱导时,联合 Simon 效应明显降低,而当单独进行诱导时则没有。这两种效应(元控制状态诱导和共同体验)似乎彼此独立。根据元控制状态理论的预测,我们的研究表明,抽象的认知目标状态可以从一个任务转移到另一个任务,能够影响不同任务情境下身体自我-他人整合的程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/90774bc4499d/426_2020_1443_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/803c50e87a88/426_2020_1443_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/b8e9a1004b87/426_2020_1443_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/c4674c824535/426_2020_1443_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/2191313d27b3/426_2020_1443_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/8185831231ec/426_2020_1443_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/90774bc4499d/426_2020_1443_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/803c50e87a88/426_2020_1443_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/b8e9a1004b87/426_2020_1443_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/c4674c824535/426_2020_1443_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/2191313d27b3/426_2020_1443_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/8185831231ec/426_2020_1443_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c273/8440260/90774bc4499d/426_2020_1443_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Metacontrol and joint action: how shared goals transfer from one task to another?元控制与联合行动:共享目标如何从一项任务转移到另一项任务?
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2769-2781. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01443-9. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
2
The carry-over effect of competition in task-sharing: evidence from the joint Simon task.任务共享中竞争的延续效应:来自联合西蒙任务的证据。
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 4;9(6):e97991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097991. eCollection 2014.
3
Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces.成功的障碍:物理隔离可优化共享工作区中的事件文件检索。
Psychol Res. 2018 Nov;82(6):1158-1176. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0886-2. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
4
Competitive Game Play Attenuates Self-Other Integration during Joint Task Performance.竞争性游戏行为会削弱联合任务执行过程中的自我-他人整合。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 3;7:274. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00274. eCollection 2016.
5
Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task.社会与非社会 Simon 任务中的trial-to-trial 序列依存关系。
Psychol Res. 2011 Sep;75(5):366-75. doi: 10.1007/s00426-010-0314-3. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
6
Whose turn is it anyway? The moderating role of response-execution certainty on the joint Simon effect.到底该谁来?反应执行确定性对联合西蒙效应的调节作用。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):833-841. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0901-7. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
7
Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.你真的代表我的任务吗?对意外事件的序列适应效应支持联合西蒙效应的参照编码。
Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):449-63. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0664-y. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
8
Examination of the joint Simon effect in rats: Changes in task performance based on actions of the partner.大鼠关节西蒙效应的检测:基于伙伴动作的任务表现变化。
Behav Processes. 2024 Mar;216:105005. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105005. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
9
Facilitation and interference components in the joint Simon task.联合西蒙任务中的促进和干扰成分。
Exp Brain Res. 2011 Jun;211(3-4):337-43. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2711-2. Epub 2011 May 10.
10
Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task.群体成员身份会影响自发的心理表征:在联合行动任务中无法表征外群体。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e79178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079178. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of cognitive load and social context on co-representation in joint actions.认知负荷和社会背景对联合行动中共同表征的影响。
Cogn Process. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s10339-025-01292-7.
2
Association between Reaction Times in the Joint Simon Task and Personality Traits.联合西蒙任务中的反应时间与人格特质之间的关联。
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 15;13(8):1207. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081207.

本文引用的文献

1
Embodied self-other overlap in romantic love: a review and integrative perspective.浪漫爱情中的具身自我-他人重叠:综述与综合观点。
Psychol Res. 2021 Apr;85(3):899-914. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01301-8. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
2
The roles of action selection and actor selection in joint task settings.在联合任务设置中,动作选择和执行者选择的作用。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:184-192. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
3
Are You Keeping an Eye on Me? The Influence of Competition and Cooperation on Joint Simon Task Performance.
你在盯着我吗?竞争与合作对联合西蒙任务表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 3;9:1361. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01361. eCollection 2018.
4
The influence of passionate love on self-other discrimination during joint action.激情之爱对共同行动中自我-他人区分的影响。
Psychol Res. 2020 Feb;84(1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-0981-z. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
5
Metacontrol and body ownership: divergent thinking increases the virtual hand illusion.自我控制与身体所有权:发散思维增加虚拟手错觉。
Psychol Res. 2020 Feb;84(1):120-127. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-0976-9. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
6
Towards a Unitary Approach to Human Action Control.迈向人类动作控制的单一方法。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Dec;21(12):940-949. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.09.009.
7
The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).日本招财猫对关节空间兼容性效应的影响:对多尔克、霍梅尔、普林茨和利佩尔特(2013年)的一项重复研究及拓展
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184844. eCollection 2017.
8
Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task.共享任务还是共享动作?来自联合西蒙任务的证据。
Psychol Res. 2018 Mar;82(2):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0821-y. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
9
No evidence for shared representations of task sets in joint task switching.在联合任务切换中,没有证据表明存在任务集的共享表征。
Psychol Res. 2017 Nov;81(6):1166-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0813-y. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
10
Pointing out mechanisms underlying joint action.指出联合行动背后的机制。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 May;78(4):972-7. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1093-8.