Luft Nikolaus, Wozniak Piotr A, Aschinger Gerold C, Fondi Klemens, Bata Ahmed M, Werkmeister René M, Schmidl Doreen, Witkowska Katarzyna J, Bolz Matthias, Garhöfer Gerhard, Schmetterer Leopold
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 2Department of Ophthalmology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria 3University Eye Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria 4Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 1;57(13):5417-5425. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19896.
This study evaluated the validity of retinal perfusion measurements using laser speckle flowgraphy (LSFG) by means of in vitro experiments and direct comparison with dual-beam Doppler optical coherence tomography (D-OCT) in a healthy Caucasian population.
The flow velocity of scattering solution pumped through a glass capillary was measured at 17 different flow velocities (range, 0.5-47 mm/s) using LSFG. The flow within the glass capillary was produced by a computer-controlled infusion pump. In vivo, three consecutive LSFG scans were obtained in 20 eyes of 20 healthy Caucasian subjects before and after pharmacological pupil dilation. Relative flow volume (RFV), the primary output parameter of LSFG, was comparatively validated relative to absolute measurements of retinal blood flow and velocity as obtained from D-OCT.
In the in vitro experiments, RFV was found to saturate at a level of approximately 700 arbitrary units (au) or 23.5 mm/s of actual velocity. In vivo, RFV was in significant agreement with absolute blood flow measurements as obtained from D-OCT in arteries (r = 0.69, P = 0.001) and veins (r = 0.74, P < 0.001). However, linear regression analysis revealed significant positive zero offset values for RFV of 223.4 and 282.7 au in arteries and veins, respectively.
Measurements of RFV were successfully obtainable, reproducible, and not influenced by pharmacological pupil dilation. Nevertheless, our data revealed flaws in the LSFG method of measuring retinal perfusion in Caucasians. Adjustment to the technique is required to address apparent issues with RFV, especially saturation effects with higher arterial flow rates. The present dataset may provide a valuable tool to do so. (Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT02582411).
本研究通过体外实验以及与双光束多普勒光学相干断层扫描(D-OCT)在健康白种人群中的直接比较,评估激光散斑血流图(LSFG)测量视网膜灌注的有效性。
使用LSFG在17种不同流速(范围为0.5 - 47 mm/s)下测量通过玻璃毛细管泵送的散射溶液的流速。玻璃毛细管内的流动由计算机控制的输液泵产生。在体内,对20名健康白种受试者的20只眼睛在药物性瞳孔散大前后进行连续三次LSFG扫描。相对于从D-OCT获得的视网膜血流和速度的绝对测量值,对LSFG的主要输出参数相对血流量(RFV)进行比较验证。
在体外实验中,发现RFV在约700任意单位(au)或实际流速23.5 mm/s的水平达到饱和。在体内,RFV与从D-OCT获得的动脉(r = 0.69,P = 0.001)和静脉(r = 0.74,P < 0.001)的绝对血流测量值显著一致。然而,线性回归分析显示动脉和静脉中RFV的显著正零偏移值分别为223.4和282.7 au。
成功获得了RFV的测量值,具有可重复性,且不受药物性瞳孔散大的影响。尽管如此,我们的数据揭示了LSFG测量白种人视网膜灌注方法中的缺陷。需要对该技术进行调整以解决RFV的明显问题,特别是较高动脉流速下的饱和效应。本数据集可能为此提供一个有价值的工具。(Clinicaltrials.gov编号NCT02582411)