文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

自动检测Ki67在乳腺癌中的预后价值:对来自10个研究组的8088例患者的集中评估

Prognostic value of automated KI67 scoring in breast cancer: a centralised evaluation of 8088 patients from 10 study groups.

作者信息

Abubakar Mustapha, Orr Nick, Daley Frances, Coulson Penny, Ali H Raza, Blows Fiona, Benitez Javier, Milne Roger, Brenner Herman, Stegmaier Christa, Mannermaa Arto, Chang-Claude Jenny, Rudolph Anja, Sinn Peter, Couch Fergus J, Devilee Peter, Tollenaar Rob A E M, Seynaeve Caroline, Figueroa Jonine, Sherman Mark E, Lissowska Jolanta, Hewitt Stephen, Eccles Diana, Hooning Maartje J, Hollestelle Antoinette, Martens John W M, van Deurzen Carolien H M, Bolla Manjeet K, Wang Qin, Jones Michael, Schoemaker Minouk, Wesseling Jelle, van Leeuwen Flora E, Van 't Veer Laura, Easton Douglas, Swerdlow Anthony J, Dowsett Mitch, Pharoah Paul D, Schmidt Marjanka K, Garcia-Closas Montserrat

机构信息

Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, London, SM2 5NG, UK.

Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Division of Breast Cancer Research, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res. 2016 Oct 18;18(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13058-016-0765-6.


DOI:10.1186/s13058-016-0765-6
PMID:27756439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5070183/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The value of KI67 in breast cancer prognostication has been questioned due to concerns on the analytical validity of visual KI67 assessment and methodological limitations of published studies. Here, we investigate the prognostic value of automated KI67 scoring in a large, multicentre study, and compare this with pathologists' visual scores available in a subset of patients. METHODS: We utilised 143 tissue microarrays containing 15,313 tumour tissue cores from 8088 breast cancer patients in 10 collaborating studies. A total of 1401 deaths occurred during a median follow-up of 7.5 years. Centralised KI67 assessment was performed using an automated scoring protocol. The relationship of KI67 levels with 10-year breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) was investigated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Patients in the highest quartile of KI67 (>12 % positive KI67 cells) had a worse 10-year BCSS than patients in the lower three quartiles. This association was statistically significant for ER-positive patients (hazard ratio (HR) (95 % CI) at baseline = 1.96 (1.31-2.93); P = 0.001) but not for ER-negative patients (1.23 (0.86-1.77); P = 0.248) (P-heterogeneity = 0.064). In spite of differences in characteristics of the study populations, the estimates of HR were consistent across all studies (P-heterogeneity = 0.941 for ER-positive and P-heterogeneity = 0.866 for ER-negative). Among ER-positive cancers, KI67 was associated with worse prognosis in both node-negative (2.47 (1.16-5.27)) and node-positive (1.74 (1.05-2.86)) tumours (P-heterogeneity = 0.671). Further classification according to ER, PR and HER2 showed statistically significant associations with prognosis among hormone receptor-positive patients regardless of HER2 status (P-heterogeneity = 0.270) and among triple-negative patients (1.70 (1.02-2.84)). Model fit parameters were similar for visual and automated measures of KI67 in a subset of 2440 patients with information from both sources. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this large-scale multicentre analysis with centrally generated automated KI67 scores show strong evidence in support of a prognostic value for automated KI67 scoring in breast cancer. Given the advantages of automated scoring in terms of its potential for standardisation, reproducibility and throughput, automated methods appear to be promising alternatives to visual scoring for KI67 assessment.

摘要

背景:由于对视觉评估 KI67 的分析有效性以及已发表研究的方法局限性存在担忧,KI67 在乳腺癌预后评估中的价值受到质疑。在此,我们在一项大型多中心研究中调查自动 KI67 评分的预后价值,并将其与一部分患者中病理学家的视觉评分进行比较。 方法:我们利用了来自 10 项合作研究中 8088 例乳腺癌患者的 143 个组织微阵列,其中包含 15313 个肿瘤组织芯块。在中位随访 7.5 年期间共发生 1401 例死亡。使用自动评分方案进行集中的 KI67 评估。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线和针对已知预后因素进行调整的 Cox 比例风险回归模型,研究 KI67 水平与 10 年乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)的关系。 结果:KI67 最高四分位数(>12% KI67 阳性细胞)的患者 10 年 BCSS 比低三个四分位数的患者差。这种关联在雌激素受体(ER)阳性患者中具有统计学意义(基线时风险比(HR)(95%置信区间)=1.96(1.31 - 2.93);P = 0.001),但在 ER 阴性患者中无统计学意义(1.23(0.86 - 1.77);P = 0.248)(P 异质性 = 0.064)。尽管研究人群特征存在差异,但所有研究中 HR 的估计值是一致的(ER 阳性患者的 P 异质性 = 0.941,ER 阴性患者的 P 异质性 = 0.866)。在 ER 阳性癌症中,KI67 与淋巴结阴性(2.47(1.16 - 5.27))和淋巴结阳性(1.74(1.05 - 2.86))肿瘤的预后较差均相关(P 异质性 = 0.671)。根据 ER、孕激素受体(PR)和人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2)进一步分类显示,无论 HER2 状态如何,在激素受体阳性患者中与预后存在统计学显著关联(P 异质性 = 0.270),在三阴性患者中也存在关联(1.70(1.02 - 2.84))。在有两种评分信息的 2440 例患者子集中,KI67 的视觉和自动测量的模型拟合参数相似。 结论:这项大规模多中心分析采用集中生成的自动 KI67 评分的结果有力支持了自动 KI67 评分在乳腺癌中的预后价值。鉴于自动评分在标准化、可重复性和通量方面的优势,自动方法似乎是 KI67 评估中视觉评分的有前景的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7484/5070183/81d45a4677d5/13058_2016_765_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7484/5070183/92e0e7b375ed/13058_2016_765_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7484/5070183/af608e246ad5/13058_2016_765_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7484/5070183/81d45a4677d5/13058_2016_765_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7484/5070183/92e0e7b375ed/13058_2016_765_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7484/5070183/af608e246ad5/13058_2016_765_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7484/5070183/81d45a4677d5/13058_2016_765_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Prognostic value of automated KI67 scoring in breast cancer: a centralised evaluation of 8088 patients from 10 study groups.

Breast Cancer Res. 2016-10-18

[2]
A Ki67/BCL2 index based on immunohistochemistry is highly prognostic in ER-positive breast cancer.

J Pathol. 2011-9-26

[3]
Spatial distributions of CD8 and Ki67 cells in the tumor microenvironment independently predict breast cancer-specific survival in patients with ER+HER2- and triple-negative breast carcinoma.

PLoS One. 2024

[4]
The Ki67 dilemma: investigating prognostic cut-offs and reproducibility for automated Ki67 scoring in breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024-8

[5]
Intratumoral heterogeneity of Ki67 proliferation index outperforms conventional immunohistochemistry prognostic factors in estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer.

Virchows Arch. 2025-2

[6]
The prognostic value of Ki67 in systemically untreated patients with node-negative breast cancer.

J Clin Pathol. 2014-1-8

[7]
Power of PgR expression as a prognostic factor for ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer patients at intermediate risk classified by the Ki67 labeling index.

BMC Cancer. 2017-5-22

[8]
Prognostic value of breast cancer subtypes, Ki-67 proliferation index, age, and pathologic tumor characteristics on breast cancer survival in Caucasian women.

Breast J. 2012-12-13

[9]
Prognostic potential of automated Ki67 evaluation in breast cancer: different hot spot definitions versus true global score.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020-8

[10]
Predictive value and clinical utility of centrally assessed ER, PgR, and Ki-67 to select adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer: TEXT and SOFT trials.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Proliferative Markers in Breast Cancer and Chemotherapy Implications: A Comprehensive Review.

Health Sci Rep. 2025-4-8

[2]
Conventional chemotherapy: millions of cures, unresolved therapeutic index.

Nat Rev Cancer. 2025-3

[3]
Advancing Ki67 hotspot detection in breast cancer: a comparative analysis of automated digital image analysis algorithms.

Histopathology. 2025-1

[4]
The Ki67 dilemma: investigating prognostic cut-offs and reproducibility for automated Ki67 scoring in breast cancer.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024-8

[5]
Clinical and Analytical Validation of Two Methods for Ki-67 Scoring in Formalin Fixed and Paraffin Embedded Tissue Sections of Early Breast Cancer.

Cancers (Basel). 2024-4-3

[6]
The Role of Ki-67 in HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer: A Real-World Study of 956 Patients.

Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2024-3-8

[7]
Use of a Novel Deep Learning Open-Source Model for Quantification of Ki-67 in Breast Cancer Patients in Pakistan: A Comparative Study between the Manual and Automated Methods.

Diagnostics (Basel). 2023-9-30

[8]
Breast cancer in young Indian women: factors, challenges in screening, and upcoming diagnostics.

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023-11

[9]
SRSF3-Mediated Ki67 Exon 7-Inclusion Promotes Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression via Repressing AKR1C2.

Int J Mol Sci. 2023-2-15

[10]
Evaluation and comparison of different breast cancer prognosis scores based on gene expression data.

Breast Cancer Res. 2023-2-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
High-throughput automated scoring of Ki67 in breast cancer tissue microarrays from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.

J Pathol Clin Res. 2016-4-6

[2]
Performance of automated scoring of ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6 and EGFR in breast cancer tissue microarrays in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.

J Pathol Clin Res. 2014-12-4

[3]
Prognostic value of different cut-off levels of Ki-67 in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64,196 patients.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015-10

[4]
Ki67--no evidence for its use in node-positive breast cancer.

Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2015-3-17

[5]
Standardized Ki67 Diagnostics Using Automated Scoring--Clinical Validation in the GeparTrio Breast Cancer Study.

Clin Cancer Res. 2014-12-11

[6]
A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.

Breast Cancer Res. 2014

[7]
The PAM50 risk-of-recurrence score predicts risk for late distant recurrence after endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer.

Clin Cancer Res. 2014-2-11

[8]
An international Ki67 reproducibility study.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013-11-7

[9]
Primary breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Ann Oncol. 2013-10

[10]
Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013.

Ann Oncol. 2013-8-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索