• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Accountability: a social magnifier of the dilution effect.

作者信息

Tetlock P E, Boettger R

机构信息

Institute of Personality Assessment and Research, University of California, Berkeley 94720.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Sep;57(3):388-98. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.3.388.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.57.3.388
PMID:2778629
Abstract

This research demonstrated that accountability can not only reduce judgmental bias, but also exacerbate it--in this case, the dilution effect. Ss made predictions from either diagnostic information alone or diagnostic information plus mixtures of additional data (nondiagnostic information, additional diagnostic data pointing to either the same conclusion or the opposite conclusion). Relative to unaccountable Ss, accountable Ss (a) diluted their predictions in response to nondiagnostic information and (b) were more responsive to additional diagnostic information. The accountability manipulation motivated subjects to use a wide range of information in making judgments, but did not make them more discriminating judges of the usefulness of that information.

摘要

相似文献

1
Accountability: a social magnifier of the dilution effect.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Sep;57(3):388-98. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.3.388.
2
Dilution and confirmation of probability judgments based on nondiagnostic evidence.基于非诊断性证据的概率判断的稀释与确认
Mem Cognit. 2004 Oct;32(7):1076-89. doi: 10.3758/bf03196883.
3
Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Apr;52(4):700-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.4.700.
4
Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems.明智的干预:解决社会和个人问题的心理疗法。
Psychol Rev. 2018 Oct;125(5):617-655. doi: 10.1037/rev0000115.
5
Children's judgments of kindness.儿童对善良的判断。
Child Dev. 1970 Mar;41(1):29-47.
6
Self-evaluation maintenance and the mediational role of emotion: the perception of friends and strangers.自我评价维持与情绪的中介作用:对朋友和陌生人的认知
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Sep;57(3):442-56. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.3.442.
7
[The effect of accuracy motivation on face function in person perception].[准确性动机对人物感知中面部功能的影响]
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 1998 Feb;68(6):465-70. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.68.465.
8
The self and social judgment: effects of affective reaction and "own position" on judgments of unambiguous and ambiguous information about others.自我与社会判断:情感反应和“自身立场”对关于他人的明确和模糊信息判断的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Dec;61(6):884-97. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.6.884.
9
On the relativity of athletic performance: a comparison perspective on performance judgments in sports.论运动成绩的相对性:体育比赛中成绩判定的比较视角
Prog Brain Res. 2009;174:13-24. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)01302-8.
10
The goal of forming accurate impressions during social interactions: attenuating the impact of negative expectancies.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Mar;56(3):374-86. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.3.374.

引用本文的文献

1
Professors Prioritize Increasing Female Retention in Academic Physics Over Advisee's Interests.教授们将提高学术物理学领域女性留存率置于被指导者的兴趣之上。
Front Sociol. 2022 Feb 2;6:751703. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.751703. eCollection 2021.
2
Moderators of the Liking Bias in Judgments of Moral Character.评判道德品质时喜欢偏差的调节因素。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Apr;48(4):596-605. doi: 10.1177/01461672211013272. Epub 2021 May 28.
3
A Matter of Reevaluation: Incentivizing Users to Contribute Reviews in Online Platforms.重新评估的问题:激励用户在在线平台上撰写评论
Decis Support Syst. 2020 Jan;128. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2019.113158. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
4
Eagerness and Optimistically Biased Metaperception: The More Eager to Learn Others' Evaluations, the Higher the Estimation of Others' Evaluations.急切与乐观偏差的元认知:越急于了解他人的评价,对他人评价的估计就越高。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 15;9:715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00715. eCollection 2018.
5
The asymmetrical force of persuasive knowledge across the positive-negative divide.
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 4;6:1324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01324. eCollection 2015.
6
Value seeking and prediction-decision inconsistency: why don't people take what they predict they'll like the most?价值追求与预测-决策不一致:为什么人们不选择他们预测自己会最喜欢的东西?
Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Dec;6(4):555-61. doi: 10.3758/bf03212963.