Anthony T Renée, Cai Changjie, Mehaffy John, Sleeth Darrah, Volckens John
a Department of Occupational and Environmental Health , University of Iowa , Iowa City , Iowa.
b Department of Mechanical Engineering , Colorado State University , Fort Collins , Colorado.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017 May;14(5):313-322. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1240872.
A high-flow inhalable sampler, designed for operational flow rates up to 10 L/min using computer simulations and examined in wind tunnel experiments, was evaluated in the field. This prototype sampler was deployed in collocation with an IOM (the benchmark standard sampler) in a swine farrowing building to examine the sampling performance for assessing concentrations of inhalable particulate mass and endotoxin. Paired samplers were deployed for 24 hr on 19 days over a 3-month period. On each sampling day, the paired samplers were deployed at three fixed locations and data were analyzed to identify agreement and to examine systematic biases between concentrations measured by these samplers. Thirty-six paired gravimetric samples were analyzed; insignificant, unsubstantial differences between concentrations were identified between the two samplers (p = 0.16; mean difference 0.03 mg/m). Forty-four paired samples were available for endotoxin analysis, and a significant (p = 0.001) difference in endotoxin concentration was identified: the prototype sampler, on average, had 120 EU/m more endotoxin than did the IOM samples. Since the same gravimetric samples were analyzed for endotoxin content, the endotoxin difference is likely attributable to differences in endotoxin extraction. The prototype's disposable thin-film polycarbonate capsule was included with the filter in the 1-hr extraction procedure while the internal plastic cassette of the IOM required a rinse procedure that is susceptible to dust losses. Endotoxin concentrations measured with standard plastic IOM inserts that follow this rinsing procedure may underestimate the true endotoxin exposure concentrations. The maximum concentrations in the study (1.55 mg/m gravimetric, 2328 EU/m endotoxin) were lower than other agricultural or industrial environments. Future work should explore the performance of the prototype sampler in dustier environments, where concentrations approach particulates not otherwise specified (PNOS) limits of 10 mg/m, including using the prototype as a personal sampler.
一种高流量可吸入采样器,通过计算机模拟设计用于高达10升/分钟的操作流量,并在风洞实验中进行了测试,在现场进行了评估。该原型采样器与IOM(基准标准采样器)搭配部署在一个母猪分娩舍中,以检查用于评估可吸入颗粒物质量和内毒素浓度的采样性能。在3个月的时间里,成对的采样器在19天内部署了24小时。在每个采样日,成对的采样器部署在三个固定位置,并对数据进行分析,以确定一致性并检查这些采样器测量的浓度之间的系统偏差。分析了36对重量法样品;两个采样器之间的浓度差异不显著(p = 0.16;平均差异0.03毫克/立方米)。有44对样品可用于内毒素分析,并且发现内毒素浓度存在显著差异(p = 0.001):原型采样器平均比IOM样品多120 EU/立方米的内毒素。由于对相同的重量法样品进行了内毒素含量分析,内毒素差异可能归因于内毒素提取的差异。在1小时的提取过程中,原型的一次性薄膜聚碳酸酯胶囊与过滤器一起包含在内,而IOM的内部塑料盒需要冲洗程序,这容易造成灰尘损失。按照此冲洗程序使用标准塑料IOM插入物测量的内毒素浓度可能会低估真实的内毒素暴露浓度。该研究中的最高浓度(重量法为1.55毫克/立方米,内毒素为2328 EU/立方米)低于其他农业或工业环境。未来的工作应探索原型采样器在灰尘较多的环境中的性能,在这些环境中浓度接近未另作规定的颗粒物(PNOS)限值10毫克/立方米,包括将原型用作个人采样器。