a National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) , Health Effects Laboratory Division, Exposure Assessment Branch , Morgantown , West Virginia.
b Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering , West Virginia University , Morgantown , West Virginia.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2019 Mar;16(3):250-257. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2019.1568444. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
This study evaluates the performance of the disposable inhalable aerosol sampler (DIAS), a new sampler developed to be more cost-effective than the traditional inhalable particle samplers and comparable to the inhalable particle sampling convention. Forty-eight pairs of the DIAS prototype and the IOM sampler were utilized to collect copper exposure measurements (23 personal and 25 area) at an electrorefinery facility. The geometric mean (GM) value of ratios of exposure data (DIAS/IOM) was 1.1, while the GM of ratios (DIAS/IOM) was 1.6 for the area exposure data, revealing 84% of the ratios were greater than one. For both personal and area exposure data, the concordance correlation coefficient tests revealed significant disagreements between the two types of samplers and suggested precision as the source of the disagreement. The estimated mean concentration was higher for the DIAS compared that for the IOM for the area exposure data (p < 0.05), while the results were comparable for the personal exposure data (p = 0.49). Overall, the DIAS generated higher exposure results compared to the IOM sampler for the area exposures. For the personal exposures, the findings were inconclusive due to inconsistent results of factors aforementioned. This study is limited to one metal component (copper) of the dust at a worksite. To date, this is the first field evaluation using personal exposure data to test the performance of the DIAS and the second evaluation using area exposure data. Thus, it will be necessary to conduct additional field evaluations with various elements to further evaluate the performance of the DIAS. In addition, particle migration to the internal walls of the cap was observed during the transportation of collected samples to a laboratory for both sampler types (6.4% for the DIAS and 7.4% for the IOM). Occupational health and safety professionals should be aware of potential errors caused from transferring samples from a field to a laboratory and should be careful not to exclude particles collected on the caps.
本研究评估了一次性可吸入气溶胶采样器(DIAS)的性能,该采样器是为了比传统的可吸入颗粒物采样器更具成本效益而开发的,并且与可吸入颗粒物采样标准相当。在一家精炼厂,使用 48 对 DIAS 原型和 IOM 采样器收集铜暴露测量值(23 份个人暴露值和 25 份区域暴露值)。暴露数据(DIAS/IOM)比值的几何平均值(GM)为 1.1,而区域暴露数据比值的 GM 为 1.6,表明 84%的比值大于 1。对于个人和区域暴露数据,一致性相关系数检验表明两种采样器之间存在显著差异,并表明差异的来源是精度。对于区域暴露数据,DIAS 估计的平均浓度高于 IOM(p<0.05),而对于个人暴露数据,结果则相似(p=0.49)。总体而言,与 IOM 采样器相比,DIAS 产生的区域暴露结果更高。对于个人暴露,由于上述因素的结果不一致,结果尚无定论。本研究仅限于工作场所粉尘中的一种金属成分(铜)。迄今为止,这是首次使用个人暴露数据进行现场评估来测试 DIAS 的性能,也是第二次使用区域暴露数据进行评估。因此,有必要进行更多的现场评估,使用各种元素进一步评估 DIAS 的性能。此外,在将收集的样品运送到实验室的过程中,两种采样器类型都观察到颗粒迁移到帽的内壁(DIAS 为 6.4%,IOM 为 7.4%)。职业健康和安全专业人员应意识到从现场到实验室转移样品可能导致的潜在误差,应小心不要排除收集在帽上的颗粒。