VanDeGrift Tammy, Dillon Heather, Camp Loreal
Donald P. Shiley School of Engineering, University of Portland, 5000 N Willamette Blvd., Portland, OR, 97203, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Aug;23(4):1159-1182. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9823-9. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
Engineers create airplanes, buildings, medical devices, and software, amongst many other things. Engineers abide by a professional code of ethics to uphold people's safety and the reputation of the profession. Likewise, students abide by a code of academic integrity while learning the knowledge and necessary skills to prepare them for the engineering and computing professions. This paper reports on studies designed to improve the engineering student culture with respect to academic integrity and ethics. To understand the existing culture at a university in the USA, a survey based on a national survey about cheating was administered to students. The incidences of self-reported cheating and incidences of not reporting others who cheat show the culture is similar to other institutions. Two interventions were designed and tested in an introduction to an engineering course: two case studies that students discussed in teams and the whole class, and a letter of recommendation assignment in which students wrote about themselves (character, strengths, examples of ethical decisions) three years into the future. Students were surveyed after the two interventions. Results show that first-year engineering students appreciate having a code of academic integrity and they want to earn their degree without cheating, yet less than half of the students would report on another cheating student. The letter of recommendation assignment had some impact on getting students to think about ethics, their character, and their actions. Future work in changing the student culture will continue in both a top-down (course interventions) and bottom-up (student-driven interventions) manner.
工程师制造飞机、建筑、医疗设备和软件等等诸多事物。工程师遵守职业道德规范以维护公众安全和行业声誉。同样,学生在学习知识和必要技能为工程与计算机专业做准备时,也要遵守学术诚信准则。本文报道了旨在改善工科学生学术诚信和道德文化的研究。为了解美国一所大学的现有文化,对学生进行了一项基于全国作弊调查的问卷调查。自我报告的作弊发生率以及不举报其他作弊者的发生率表明,该校文化与其他院校相似。在一门工程学课程导论中设计并测试了两种干预措施:两个学生分组和全班讨论的案例研究,以及一项推荐信作业,学生要在作业中描述自己三年后的情况(性格、优点、道德决策实例)。在这两种干预措施实施后对学生进行了调查。结果显示,一年级工科学生认可学术诚信准则,他们希望不作弊地获得学位,但不到一半的学生会举报其他作弊学生。推荐信作业对促使学生思考道德、自身性格和行为产生了一定影响。未来在改变学生文化方面的工作将继续采用自上而下(课程干预)和自下而上(学生驱动干预)的方式。