Orsini Caitlin A, Setlow Barry
Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
J Neurosci Res. 2017 Jan 2;95(1-2):260-269. doi: 10.1002/jnr.23810.
The ability to weigh the costs and benefits of various options to make an adaptive decision is critical to an organism's survival and wellbeing. Many psychiatric diseases are characterized by maladaptive decision making, indicating a need for better understanding of the mechanisms underlying this process and the ways in which it is altered under pathological conditions. Great strides have been made in uncovering these mechanisms, but the majority of what is known comes from studies conducted solely in male subjects. In recent years, decision-making research has begun to include female subjects to determine whether sex differences exist and to identify the mechanisms that contribute to such differences. This Mini-Review begins by describing studies that have examined sex differences in animal (largely rodent) models of decision making. Possible explanations, both theoretical and biological, for such differences in decision making are then considered. The Mini-Review concludes with a discussion of the implications of sex differences in decision making for understanding psychiatric conditions. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
权衡各种选择的成本与收益以做出适应性决策的能力,对生物体的生存和福祉至关重要。许多精神疾病的特征是决策适应不良,这表明需要更好地理解这一过程背后的机制以及在病理条件下其改变的方式。在揭示这些机制方面已经取得了很大进展,但目前已知的大部分内容来自仅在雄性受试者中进行的研究。近年来,决策研究开始纳入雌性受试者,以确定是否存在性别差异,并识别导致此类差异的机制。本综述首先描述了在动物(主要是啮齿动物)决策模型中研究性别差异的研究。然后考虑了决策中此类差异的理论和生物学方面的可能解释。本综述最后讨论了决策中的性别差异对理解精神疾病状况的影响。© 2016威利期刊公司