Suppr超能文献

疾病控制项目的大规模实施:肯尼亚西部疟疾流行地区长效驱虫蚊帐分发渠道的成本效益分析——一项研究方案

Large-scale implementation of disease control programmes: a cost-effectiveness analysis of long-lasting insecticide-treated bed net distribution channels in a malaria-endemic area of western Kenya-a study protocol.

作者信息

Gama Elvis, Were Vincent, Ouma Peter, Desai Meghna, Niessen Louis, Buff Ann M, Kariuki Simon

机构信息

Centre for Applied Health Research and delivery (CAHRD), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Kenya Medical Research Institute and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Research and Public Health Collaboration, Kisumu, Kenya.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 21;6(11):e012776. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012776.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Historically, Kenya has used various distribution models for long-lasting insecticide-treated bed nets (LLINs) with variable results in population coverage. The models presently vary widely in scale, target population and strategy. There is limited information to determine the best combination of distribution models, which will lead to sustained high coverage and are operationally efficient and cost-effective. Standardised cost information is needed in combination with programme effectiveness estimates to judge the efficiency of LLIN distribution models and options for improvement in implementing malaria control programmes. The study aims to address the information gap, estimating distribution cost and the effectiveness of different LLIN distribution models, and comparing them in an economic evaluation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Evaluation of cost and coverage will be determined for 5 different distribution models in Busia County, an area of perennial malaria transmission in western Kenya. Cost data will be collected retrospectively from health facilities, the Ministry of Health, donors and distributors. Programme-effectiveness data, defined as the number of people with access to an LLIN per 1000 population, will be collected through triangulation of data from a nationally representative, cross-sectional malaria survey, a cross-sectional survey administered to a subsample of beneficiaries in Busia County and LLIN distributors' records. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis will be used for the evaluation. A cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed from a health-systems perspective, and cost-effectiveness ratios will be calculated using bootstrapping techniques.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been evaluated and approved by Kenya Medical Research Institute, Scientific and Ethical Review Unit (SERU number 2997). All participants will provide written informed consent. The findings of this economic evaluation will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.

摘要

引言

从历史上看,肯尼亚曾采用多种长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)分发模式,但在人群覆盖率方面取得的成效各异。目前这些模式在规模、目标人群和策略上差异很大。用于确定能实现持续高覆盖率且具备运营效率和成本效益的最佳分发模式组合的信息有限。需要标准化成本信息并结合项目有效性评估,以判断长效驱虫蚊帐分发模式的效率及改进疟疾防控项目实施的选项。本研究旨在填补这一信息空白,估算不同长效驱虫蚊帐分发模式的分发成本和有效性,并在经济评估中对它们进行比较。

方法与分析

将对肯尼亚西部常年有疟疾传播的布西亚县的5种不同分发模式进行成本和覆盖率评估。成本数据将从卫生设施、卫生部、捐助方和经销商处进行回顾性收集。项目有效性数据定义为每千人口中能够获得长效驱虫蚊帐的人数,将通过对全国代表性横断面疟疾调查、布西亚县受益人群子样本的横断面调查以及长效驱虫蚊帐经销商记录的数据进行三角测量来收集。描述性统计和回归分析将用于评估。将从卫生系统角度进行成本效益分析,并使用自举技术计算成本效益比。

伦理与传播

本研究已由肯尼亚医学研究所科学与伦理审查单位评估并批准(SERU编号2997)。所有参与者将提供书面知情同意书。本次经济评估的结果将通过同行评审出版物进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3be3/5128946/8f996f0b630c/bmjopen2016012776f01.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验