Allen Peter M, Latham Keziah, Mann David L, Ravensbergen Rianne H J C, Myint Joy
Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin UniversityCambridge, UK; Vision and Eye Research Unit, Anglia Ruskin UniversityCambridge, UK.
Research Institute MOVE Amsterdam, Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 8;7:1731. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01731. eCollection 2016.
The aim of this study was to investigate the level of vision impairment (VI) that would reduce performance in shooting; to guide development of entry criteria to visually impaired (VI) shooting. Nineteen international-level shooters without VI took part in the study. Participants shot an air rifle, while standing, toward a regulation target placed at the end of a 10 m shooting range. Cambridge simulation glasses were used to simulate six different levels of VI. Visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity (CS) were assessed along with shooting performance in each of seven conditions of simulated impairment and compared to that with habitual vision. Shooting performance was evaluated by calculating each individual's average score in every level of simulated VI and normalizing this score by expressing it as a percentage of the baseline performance achieved with habitual vision. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were constructed to evaluate the ability of different VA and CS cut-off criteria to appropriately classify these athletes as achieving 'expected' or 'below expected' shooting results based on their performance with different levels of VA and CS. Shooting performance remained relatively unaffected by mild decreases in VA and CS, but quickly deteriorated with more moderate losses. The ability of visual function measurements to classify shooting performance was good, with 78% of performances appropriately classified using a cut-off of 0.53 logMAR and 74% appropriately classified using a cut-off of 0.83 logCS. The current inclusion criteria for VI shooting (1.0 logMAR) is conservative, maximizing the chance of including only those with an impairment that does impact performance, but potentially excluding some who do have a genuine impairment in the sport. A lower level of impairment would include more athletes who do have a genuine impairment but would potentially include those who do not actually have an impairment that impacts performance in the sport. An impairment to CS could impact performance in the sport and might be considered in determining eligibility to take part in VI competition.
本研究的目的是调查会降低射击成绩的视力损害(VI)水平;以指导制定视力障碍(VI)射击的参赛标准。19名无视力障碍的国际水平射手参与了该研究。参与者站着用气步枪向10米射击场尽头的标准靶射击。使用剑桥模拟眼镜模拟六种不同程度的视力损害。在七种模拟损害情况下,评估了视力(VA)和对比敏感度(CS)以及射击成绩,并与正常视力时的成绩进行比较。通过计算每个个体在每个模拟VI水平下的平均得分,并将该得分归一化,以其占正常视力时基线成绩的百分比来评估射击成绩。构建了受试者工作特征曲线,以评估不同的VA和CS截止标准根据运动员在不同VA和CS水平下的表现,将这些运动员适当地分类为达到“预期”或“低于预期”射击成绩的能力。VA和CS轻度下降时,射击成绩相对不受影响,但随着下降程度加大,成绩迅速恶化。视觉功能测量对射击成绩进行分类的能力良好,使用0.53 logMAR的截止值可对78%的成绩进行适当分类,使用0.83 logCS的截止值可对74%的成绩进行适当分类。目前VI射击的纳入标准(1.0 logMAR)较为保守,最大限度地增加了仅纳入那些确实有影响成绩的损害的人的机会,但可能会排除一些在这项运动中确实有真正损害的人。较低程度的损害会纳入更多确实有真正损害但可能也会纳入一些实际上没有影响该运动成绩的损害的运动员。CS受损可能会影响该项运动的成绩,在确定参加VI比赛的资格时可能需要考虑这一点。