• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经科临床实践中的法律挑战。

Legal challenges in neurological practice.

作者信息

Jayalakshmi Sita, Vooturi Sudhindra

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016 Oct;19(Suppl 1):S3-S8. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.192888.

DOI:10.4103/0972-2327.192888
PMID:27891018
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5109758/
Abstract

Clinical neuroscience has made tremendous advances over the last century. Neurology as a discipline is still considered challenging and at times risky due to the natural history and progressive course of few of the neurological diseases. Encouragingly, the patient and their caregivers are now increasingly willing to be actively involved in making decisions. The patients' relationship with the doctor is a reflection of the society. A society that is orienting itself toward "rating" and "feedback" has made this doctor-patient relationship, a consumer-service provider relationship. This perhaps is due to commercialization of health that usually accompanies globalization. Moreover, a rapid influx of information from potential erroneous sources such as the Internet has also made patient and caregivers not being hesitant to taking legal course in the case of adverse events during treatment or simply because of dissatisfaction. The purpose of the legal process initiated by patients with neurological ailments is more often to compensate for the income lost, physical and psychological anguish that accompanies disease and its treatment, and to fund treatment or rehabilitation requirements. However, it is not clearly established if monetary benefits acquired lead to better opportunities for recovery of the patient. The consumer protection act and commercialization of medical services may well have an adverse effect on the doctor and patient relationship. Hence, there is a great need for all medical professionals to mutually complement and update each other. This review examines legal (litigation) processes with special interest on medicolegal system in patients with neurological ailments and the challenges faced by the neurologist during day-to-day clinical practice.

摘要

在过去的一个世纪里,临床神经科学取得了巨大的进展。由于一些神经疾病的自然病程和进展过程,神经病学作为一门学科仍然被认为具有挑战性,有时甚至有风险。令人鼓舞的是,患者及其护理人员现在越来越愿意积极参与决策。患者与医生的关系是社会的一种反映。一个以“评级”和“反馈”为导向的社会,使这种医患关系变成了一种消费者与服务提供者的关系。这可能是由于通常伴随全球化而来的医疗商业化。此外,来自互联网等潜在错误来源的信息迅速涌入,也使得患者和护理人员在治疗期间出现不良事件或仅仅因为不满时,毫不犹豫地采取法律手段。患有神经疾病的患者启动法律程序的目的,更多时候是为了弥补因疾病及其治疗而损失的收入、身体和心理上的痛苦,以及为治疗或康复需求提供资金。然而,目前尚不清楚获得的金钱利益是否会为患者带来更好的康复机会。消费者保护法和医疗服务商业化很可能会对医患关系产生不利影响。因此,所有医学专业人员非常需要相互补充和更新知识。本综述特别关注神经疾病患者的法医学系统以及神经科医生在日常临床实践中面临的挑战来审视法律(诉讼)程序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869f/5109758/de2c57a5252c/AIAN-19-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869f/5109758/de2c57a5252c/AIAN-19-3-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/869f/5109758/de2c57a5252c/AIAN-19-3-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Legal challenges in neurological practice.神经科临床实践中的法律挑战。
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016 Oct;19(Suppl 1):S3-S8. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.192888.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
Do Legal Issues Deserve Space in Specialty Medical Journals ?法律问题在专业医学期刊中值得占据一席之地吗?
J Assoc Physicians India. 2016 Feb;64(2):86-87.
4
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
5
A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.审视与恐惧的故事:澳大利亚助产士对外科产科服务审查的经历、参与诉讼及其对临床实践的影响。
Midwifery. 2010 Jun;26(3):268-85. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Sep 19.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
Tuberculosis结核病
8
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.
9
[Are schizophrenic patients being told their diagnosis today in France?].[如今在法国,精神分裂症患者会被告知他们的诊断结果吗?]
Encephale. 2017 Apr;43(2):160-169. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
10
The misplace of litigation in medical practice.医疗实践中诉讼的错位。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Nov;38(4):365-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1998.tb03090.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Are interpersonal communication skills adequately taught at postgraduate specialist level in South Africa? The neurology experience.在南非,研究生专科阶段是否充分教授了人际交往技巧?神经科的经验。
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2021 Jun 15;63(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/safp.v63i1.5275.

本文引用的文献

1
Communication With Family Caregivers in the Intensive Care Unit: Answers and Questions.重症监护病房中与家庭护理人员的沟通:答疑解惑
JAMA. 2016 May 17;315(19):2075-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5637.
2
Shared Decision Making in ICUs: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.重症监护病房中的共同决策:美国危重病医学会和美国胸科学会政策声明
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan;44(1):188-201. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001396.
3
Patient Perception of Physician Compassion After a More Optimistic vs a Less Optimistic Message: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
患者对医生传递更乐观与不那么乐观信息后的同情心感知:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 May;1(2):176-83. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.297.
4
Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.全球重症监护病房中生命维持治疗的 withholding 和 withdrawal 的变异性:一项系统评价。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1572-85. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3810-5. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
5
Determinants and predictors of outcome in super refractory status epilepticus--a developing country perspective.超级难治性癫痫持续状态预后的决定因素和预测因素——以一个发展中国家的视角
Epilepsy Res. 2014 Nov;108(9):1609-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
6
The importance of word choice in the care of critically ill patients and their families.词汇选择在重症患者及其家属护理中的重要性。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Apr;40(4):606-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3201-8. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
7
Medicolegal considerations with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in stroke: a systematic review.静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗中风的法医学考量:一项系统综述
Stroke Res Treat. 2013;2013:562564. doi: 10.1155/2013/562564. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
8
Is the medicolegal issue avoidable in neurosurgery? A retrospective survey of a series of 115 medicolegal cases from public hospitals.神经外科是否可以避免法医学问题?对公立医院 115 例法医学案例的回顾性调查。
World Neurosurg. 2014 Feb;81(2):218-22. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.01.029. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
9
Information gaps for patients requiring craniotomy for benign brain lesion: a qualitative study.良性脑病变需行开颅手术患者的信息缺口:一项定性研究。
J Neurooncol. 2010 Jan;96(2):241-7. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9955-8. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
10
Patient information and education with modern media: the Spine Society of Europe Patient Line.利用现代媒体进行患者信息与教育:欧洲脊柱协会患者热线
Eur Spine J. 2009 Aug;18 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):395-401. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0973-1. Epub 2009 Apr 19.