Suppr超能文献

对面孔种族的面孔失认:不同个体对面孔种族识别障碍的差异。

Face-blind for other-race faces: Individual differences in other-race recognition impairments.

机构信息

Research School of Psychology.

School of Psychology, University of Western Australia.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jan;146(1):102-122. doi: 10.1037/xge0000249. Epub 2016 Nov 28.

Abstract

We report the existence of a previously undescribed group of people, namely individuals who are so poor at recognition of other-race faces that they meet criteria for clinical-level impairment (i.e., they are "face-blind" for other-race faces). Testing 550 participants, and using the well-validated Cambridge Face Memory Test for diagnosing face blindness, results show the rate of other-race face blindness to be nontrivial, specifically 8.1% of Caucasians and Asians raised in majority own-race countries. Results also show risk factors for other-race face blindness to include: a lack of interracial contact; and being at the lower end of the normal range of general face recognition ability (i.e., even for own-race faces); but not applying less individuating effort to other-race than own-race faces. Findings provide a potential resolution of contradictory evidence concerning the importance of the other-race effect (ORE), by explaining how it is possible for the mean ORE to be modest in size (suggesting a genuine but minor problem), and simultaneously for individuals to suffer major functional consequences in the real world (e.g., eyewitness misidentification of other-race offenders leading to wrongful imprisonment). Findings imply that, in legal settings, evaluating an eyewitness's chance of having made an other-race misidentification requires information about the underlying face recognition abilities of the individual witness. Additionally, analogy with prosopagnosia (inability to recognize even own-race faces) suggests everyday social interactions with other-race people, such as those between colleagues in the workplace, will be seriously impacted by the ORE in some people. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

我们报告了一个以前未被描述的人群的存在,即那些对异族面孔识别能力极差的个体,他们符合临床水平损伤的标准(即他们对异族面孔是“脸盲”)。通过测试 550 名参与者,并使用经过充分验证的剑桥面孔记忆测试来诊断脸盲症,结果表明异族面孔识别障碍的发生率相当可观,具体来说,在主要是本族裔国家长大的白人和亚洲人中,有 8.1%的人患有异族面孔识别障碍。研究结果还表明,异族面孔识别障碍的风险因素包括:缺乏种族间接触;以及处于正常范围内一般面孔识别能力的低端(即,即使是对本族裔面孔);但对异族面孔的个体辨别努力并不比对本族裔面孔少。这些发现为有关异族效应(ORE)重要性的矛盾证据提供了一个潜在的解决方案,通过解释为什么 ORE 的平均值可能较小(表明存在真实但较小的问题),同时个体在现实世界中会遭受重大的功能后果(例如,目击者对异族罪犯的错误识别导致错误监禁)成为可能。这些发现意味着,在法律环境中,评估目击者是否有可能对异族进行错误识别,需要了解个体目击者的潜在面孔识别能力信息。此外,与面容失认症(无法识别甚至是本族裔面孔)的类比表明,在某些人眼中,与异族人群的日常社交互动,例如工作场所中同事之间的互动,将受到 ORE 的严重影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验