Pannus Pieter, Claus Maarten, Gonzalez Maria Mercedes Perez, Ford Nathan, Fransen Katrien
Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium Department of Essential Medicines and Health Products, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland Department of HIV and Global Hepatitis Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(48):e5475. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005475.
The use of dried blood spots (DBS) instead of plasma as a specimen type for HIV-1 viral load (VL) testing facilitates the decentralization of specimen collection and can increase access to VL testing in resource-limited settings. The performance of DBS for VL testing is lower, however, when compared to the gold standard sample type plasma. In this diagnostic accuracy study, we evaluated 3 VL assays with DBS.Participants were recruited between August 2012 and April 2015. Both plasma and DBS specimens were prepared and tested for HIV-1 VL with the Roche CAP/CTM HIV-1 test v2.0, the Abbott RealTime HIV-1, and the bioMérieux NucliSENS EasyQ HIV-1 v2.0. Sensitivity and specificity to detect treatment failure at a threshold of 1000 cps/mL with DBS were determined.A total of 272 HIV-positive patients and 51 HIV-negative people were recruited in the study. The mean difference or bias between plasma and DBS VL was <0.5 log cps/mL with all 3 assays but >25% of the specimens differed by >0.5 log cps/mL.All 3 assays had comparable sensitivities around 80% and specificities around 90%. Upward misclassification rates were around 10%, but downward misclassification rates ranged from 20.3% to 23.6%. Differences in between assays were not statistically significant (P > 0.1).The 3 VL assays evaluated had suboptimal performance with DBS but still performed better than immunological or clinical monitoring. Even after the introduction of the much-anticipated point-of-care VL devices, it is expected that DBS will remain important as a complementary option for supporting access to VL monitoring, particularly in rural, resource-limited settings. Manufacturers should accelerate efforts to develop more reliable, sensitive and specific methods to test VL on DBS specimens.
使用干血斑(DBS)而非血浆作为检测HIV-1病毒载量(VL)的样本类型,有助于将样本采集工作分散化,并可增加资源有限环境下进行VL检测的机会。然而,与金标准样本类型血浆相比,DBS用于VL检测时的性能较低。在这项诊断准确性研究中,我们评估了3种用于DBS的VL检测方法。
研究对象于2012年8月至2015年4月期间招募。同时制备血浆和DBS样本,并使用罗氏CAP/CTM HIV-1检测v2.0、雅培实时HIV-1检测以及生物梅里埃NucliSENS EasyQ HIV-1 v2.0检测HIV-1 VL。确定了使用DBS在1000 cps/mL阈值下检测治疗失败的敏感性和特异性。
该研究共招募了272名HIV阳性患者和51名HIV阴性者。所有3种检测方法显示,血浆和DBS VL之间的平均差异或偏差均<0.5 log cps/mL,但超过25%的样本差异>0.5 log cps/mL。
所有3种检测方法的敏感性均约为80%,特异性均约为90%。向上误分类率约为10%,但向下误分类率在20.3%至23.6%之间。各检测方法之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.1)。
所评估的3种VL检测方法用于DBS时性能欠佳,但仍比免疫或临床监测表现更好。即使在引入备受期待的即时检测VL设备之后,预计DBS作为支持VL监测的补充选项仍将很重要,尤其是在农村资源有限的环境中。制造商应加快努力,开发更可靠、灵敏和特异的方法来检测DBS样本中的VL。