Crosse Michael J, Di Liberto Giovanni M, Bednar Adam, Lalor Edmund C
School of Engineering, Trinity Centre for Bioengineering and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College DublinDublin, Ireland; Department of Pediatrics and Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of MedicineThe Bronx, NY, USA.
School of Engineering, Trinity Centre for Bioengineering and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin Dublin, Ireland.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 30;10:604. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00604. eCollection 2016.
Understanding how brains process sensory signals in natural environments is one of the key goals of twenty-first century neuroscience. While brain imaging and invasive electrophysiology will play key roles in this endeavor, there is also an important role to be played by noninvasive, macroscopic techniques with high temporal resolution such as electro- and magnetoencephalography. But challenges exist in determining how best to analyze such complex, time-varying neural responses to complex, time-varying and multivariate natural sensory stimuli. There has been a long history of applying system identification techniques to relate the firing activity of neurons to complex sensory stimuli and such techniques are now seeing increased application to EEG and MEG data. One particular example involves fitting a filter-often referred to as a temporal response function-that describes a mapping between some feature(s) of a sensory stimulus and the neural response. Here, we first briefly review the history of these system identification approaches and describe a specific technique for deriving temporal response functions known as regularized linear regression. We then introduce a new open-source toolbox for performing this analysis. We describe how it can be used to derive (multivariate) temporal response functions describing a mapping between stimulus and response in both directions. We also explain the importance of regularizing the analysis and how this regularization can be optimized for a particular dataset. We then outline specifically how the toolbox implements these analyses and provide several examples of the types of results that the toolbox can produce. Finally, we consider some of the limitations of the toolbox and opportunities for future development and application.
理解大脑如何在自然环境中处理感觉信号是21世纪神经科学的关键目标之一。虽然脑成像和侵入性电生理学将在这一努力中发挥关键作用,但具有高时间分辨率的非侵入性宏观技术,如脑电图和脑磁图,也将发挥重要作用。但是,在确定如何最好地分析这种对复杂、随时间变化且多变量的自然感觉刺激的复杂、随时间变化的神经反应方面存在挑战。将系统识别技术应用于将神经元的放电活动与复杂的感觉刺激联系起来已有很长的历史,现在这些技术在脑电图和脑磁图数据中的应用越来越多。一个具体的例子涉及拟合一个滤波器——通常称为时间响应函数——它描述了感觉刺激的某些特征与神经反应之间的映射。在这里,我们首先简要回顾这些系统识别方法的历史,并描述一种用于推导时间响应函数的特定技术,称为正则化线性回归。然后,我们介绍一个用于执行此分析的新开源工具箱。我们描述了如何使用它来推导(多变量)时间响应函数,该函数描述了刺激和反应在两个方向上的映射。我们还解释了对分析进行正则化的重要性以及如何针对特定数据集优化这种正则化。然后,我们具体概述工具箱如何实现这些分析,并提供工具箱可以产生的结果类型的几个示例。最后,我们考虑工具箱的一些局限性以及未来发展和应用的机会。