Suppr超能文献

光学低相干反射测量法和部分相干干涉测量法光学生物测量仪在前房段测量中的比较

Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements with Optical Low-coherence Reflectometry and Partial-coherence Interferometry Optical Biometers.

作者信息

Can Ertuğrul, Duran Mustafa, Çetinkaya Tuğba, Arıtürk Nurşen

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct-Dec;23(4):288-292. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.194075.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate a new noncontact optical biometer using partial-coherence interferometry and to compare the clinical measurements with those obtained from the device using optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR).

SETTING AND DESIGN

Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. Nonrandomized, prospective clinical trial.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study was performed on the healthy phakic eyes of volunteers in the year 2014. Measurements of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), mean keratometry (K), and white-to-white (WTW) measurements obtained with the low-time coherence interferometry (LTCI) were compared with those obtained with the OLCR.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

The results were evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses. The differences between both methods were assessed using the paired -test, and its correlation was evaluated by Pearson's coefficient.

RESULTS

We examined seventy participants with a mean age of 33.06 (±9.7) (range: 19-53) years. AL measurements with LTCI and OLCR were 23.7 (±1.08) mm and 23.7 (±1.1) mm, respectively. ACD was 3.6 (±0.4) mm and 3.5 (±0.4) mm for LTCI and OLCR, respectively. The mean CCT measurements for both devices were 533 (±28) mm and 522 (±28) mm, respectively. The mean K readings measurements for LTCI and OLCR were 43.3 (±1.5) D and 43.3 (±1.5) D, respectively. The mean WTW distance measurements for both devices were 12.0 (±0.5) mm and 12.1 (±0.5) mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements with LTCI correlated well with those with the OLCR. These two devices showed good agreement for the measurement of all parameters.

摘要

目的

评估一种使用部分相干干涉测量法的新型非接触式光学生物测量仪,并将临床测量结果与使用光学低相干反射测量法(OLCR)的设备所获得的结果进行比较。

设置与设计

土耳其萨姆松的翁多库兹马伊大学。非随机前瞻性临床试验。

研究对象与方法

2014年对志愿者的健康有晶状体眼进行研究。将使用低时间相干干涉测量法(LTCI)获得的眼轴长度(AL)、前房深度(ACD)、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、平均角膜曲率(K)以及白到白(WTW)测量值与使用OLCR获得的测量值进行比较。

所用统计分析方法

使用布兰德-奥特曼分析评估结果。使用配对t检验评估两种方法之间的差异,并通过皮尔逊系数评估其相关性。

结果

我们检查了70名参与者,平均年龄为33.06(±9.7)(范围:19 - 53)岁。LTCI和OLCR测量的AL分别为23.7(±1.08)mm和23.7(±1.1)mm。LTCI和OLCR测量的ACD分别为3.6(±0.4)mm和3.5(±0.4)mm。两种设备测量的平均CCT分别为533(±28)mm和522(±28)mm。LTCI和OLCR测量的平均K读数分别为43.3(±1.5)D和43.3(±1.5)D。两种设备测量的平均WTW距离分别为12.0(±0.5)mm和12.1(±0.5)mm。

结论

LTCI测量结果与OLCR测量结果相关性良好。这两种设备在所有参数的测量上显示出良好的一致性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8dba/5141620/7a29d3066021/MEAJO-23-288-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验