Suppr超能文献

眼前节测量与旋转式 Scheimpflug 摄影和部分相干反射计的比较。

Comparison of anterior segment measurements with rotating Scheimpflug photography and partial coherence reflectometry.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Vision Science, School of Optometry and Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical College, Ministry of Health PR China.

出版信息

J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Feb;37(2):341-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.08.044.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and keratometry (K) readings measured using optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometry and high-resolution rotating Scheimpflug photography.

SETTING

Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, China.

DESIGN

Comparative case series.

METHODS

The CCT, ACD endothelium to lens, ACD epithelium to lens, and K (mean; in flattest meridian; in steepest meridian) were measured 5 times using the LenStar/Biograph OLCR biometer and 3 times with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system in eyes of healthy volunteers. Concordance was evaluated using paired t tests, the Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS

The CCT, ACD endothelium to lens, and ACD epithelium to lens measured with the Scheimpflug system were slightly, albeit significantly, higher than with the OLCR biometer (P<.05); the respective 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were -8.2 μm to 15.7 μm, -0.11 to 0.15 mm, and -0.13 to 0.17 mm. However, the Scheimpflug system gave significantly flatter readings for K in the flattest meridian (95% LoA, -0.54 to 0.32 diopters [D]), K in the steepest meridian (95% LoA, -0.63 to 0.45 D), and mean K (95% LoA, -0.53 to 0.33 D) (P<.001). The CCT, ACD, and K readings were all highly correlated between the 2 devices (r >0.95, P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The CCT and ACD measurements with the OLCR biometer and Scheimpflug system can be used interchangeably in healthy young subjects. However, for K measurements, these devices have wide LoA so may not be interchangeable under certain clinical circumstances.

摘要

目的

比较光学低相干反射计(OLCR)生物测量和高分辨率旋转 Scheimpflug 摄影测量的中央角膜厚度(CCT)、前房深度(ACD)和角膜曲率(K)读数。

设置

中国温州医科大学眼视光医院。

设计

对比病例系列。

方法

使用 LenStar/Biograph OLCR 生物测量仪 5 次和 Pentacam Scheimpflug 系统 3 次测量健康志愿者眼的 CCT、内皮至晶状体的 ACD、上皮至晶状体的 ACD 和 K(平均值;最平坦子午线;最陡峭子午线)。使用配对 t 检验、Pearson 相关和 Bland-Altman 分析评估一致性。

结果

Scheimpflug 系统测量的 CCT、内皮至晶状体的 ACD 和上皮至晶状体的 ACD 略高,但差异有统计学意义(P<.05);各自的 95%一致性界限(LoA)分别为-8.2μm 至 15.7μm、-0.11 至 0.15mm 和-0.13 至 0.17mm。然而,Scheimpflug 系统在最平坦子午线的 K 读数明显较平坦(95%LoA,-0.54 至 0.32 屈光度[D])、最陡峭子午线的 K 读数(95%LoA,-0.63 至 0.45 D)和平均 K 读数(95%LoA,-0.53 至 0.33 D)(P<.001)。两种设备之间的 CCT、ACD 和 K 读数均高度相关(r>0.95,P<.001)。

结论

在健康年轻受试者中,OLCR 生物测量仪和 Scheimpflug 系统的 CCT 和 ACD 测量可以互换使用。然而,对于 K 测量,这些设备的 LoA 较宽,因此在某些临床情况下可能无法互换。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验