Petrykiv Sergei I, de Zeeuw Dick, Persson Frederik, Rossing Peter, Gansevoort Ron T, Laverman Gozewijn D, Heerspink Hiddo J L
Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Steno Diabetes Center, Gentofte, Denmark.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jun;83(6):1197-1204. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13217. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Albuminuria-lowering drugs have shown different effect size in different individuals. Since urine albumin levels are known to vary considerably from day-to-day, we questioned whether the between-individual variability in albuminuria response after therapy initiation reflects a random variability or a true response variation to treatment. In addition, we questioned whether the response variability is drug dependent.
To determine whether the response to treatment is random or a true drug response, we correlated in six clinical trials the change in albuminuria during placebo or active treatment (on-treatment) with the change in albuminuria during wash-out (off-treatment). If these responses correlate during active treatment, it suggests that at least part of the response variability can be attributed to drug response variability. We tested this for enalapril, losartan, aliskiren, atrasentan and paricalcitol.
No correlation between the on- and off-treatment albuminuria change was observed in the placebo arm of all clinical trials (R < 0.01). However, we observed significant associations between the on- and off-treatment response (R 0.14 to 0.57; all P < 0.015) for different albuminuria lowering drugs. Additionally, the albuminuria responses strongly correlated when the same individual was re-exposed to the same drug at the same dose: lisinopril 10 mg day (R = 53%; P < 0.01), losartan 50 mg day (R = 63%; P < 0.01).
The degree of albuminuria lowering with antialbuminuric drugs varies between patients. This variability in response appears drug-class independent. Identifying which factors determine this initial short-term variation in drug response appears important since the degree of albuminuria lowering is related to subsequent long-term renoprotection.
降低蛋白尿的药物在不同个体中显示出不同的效应大小。由于已知尿白蛋白水平在一天内会有很大变化,我们质疑治疗开始后蛋白尿反应的个体间变异性是反映随机变异性还是对治疗的真实反应变化。此外,我们质疑反应变异性是否依赖于药物。
为了确定对治疗的反应是随机的还是真正的药物反应,我们在六项临床试验中,将安慰剂或活性治疗期间(治疗中)蛋白尿的变化与洗脱期(治疗后)蛋白尿的变化进行了相关性分析。如果这些反应在活性治疗期间相关,则表明至少部分反应变异性可归因于药物反应变异性。我们对依那普利、氯沙坦、阿利吉仑、阿曲生坦和帕立骨化醇进行了此项测试。
在所有临床试验的安慰剂组中,未观察到治疗中和治疗后蛋白尿变化之间的相关性(R<0.01)。然而,我们观察到不同的降低蛋白尿药物在治疗中和治疗后的反应之间存在显著关联(R为0.14至0.57;所有P<0.015)。此外,当同一个体以相同剂量再次接受相同药物治疗时,蛋白尿反应强烈相关:赖诺普利10毫克/天(R=53%;P<0.01),氯沙坦50毫克/天(R=63%;P<0.01)。
抗蛋白尿药物降低蛋白尿的程度在患者之间有所不同。这种反应变异性似乎与药物类别无关。确定哪些因素决定了药物反应的这种初始短期变化似乎很重要,因为蛋白尿降低的程度与随后的长期肾脏保护有关。