Iivanainen Joonas, Stenroos Matti, Parkkonen Lauri
Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland.
Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland.
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:542-553. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.048. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
Optically-pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have recently reached sensitivity levels required for magnetoencephalography (MEG). OPMs do not need cryogenics and can thus be placed within millimetres from the scalp into an array that adapts to the individual head size and shape, thereby reducing the distance from cortical sources to the sensors. Here, we quantified the improvement in recording MEG with hypothetical on-scalp OPM arrays compared to a 306-channel state-of-the-art SQUID array (102 magnetometers and 204 planar gradiometers). We simulated OPM arrays that measured either normal (nOPM; 102 sensors), tangential (tOPM; 204 sensors), or all components (aOPM; 306 sensors) of the magnetic field. We built forward models based on magnetic resonance images of 10 adult heads; we employed a three-compartment boundary element model and distributed current dipoles evenly across the cortical mantle. Compared to the SQUID magnetometers, nOPM and tOPM yielded 7.5 and 5.3 times higher signal power, while the correlations between the field patterns of source dipoles were reduced by factors of 2.8 and 3.6, respectively. Values of the field-pattern correlations were similar across nOPM, tOPM and SQUID gradiometers. Volume currents reduced the signals of primary currents on average by 10%, 72% and 15% in nOPM, tOPM and SQUID magnetometers, respectively. The information capacities of the OPM arrays were clearly higher than that of the SQUID array. The dipole-localization accuracies of the arrays were similar while the minimum-norm-based point-spread functions were on average 2.4 and 2.5 times more spread for the SQUID array compared to nOPM and tOPM arrays, respectively.
光泵磁力仪(OPM)最近已达到脑磁图(MEG)所需的灵敏度水平。OPM不需要低温环境,因此可以放置在距离头皮几毫米的位置,形成一个能适应个体头部大小和形状的阵列,从而缩短从皮质源到传感器的距离。在此,我们量化了与306通道的先进超导量子干涉装置(SQUID)阵列(102个磁力仪和204个平面梯度仪)相比,使用假设的头皮上OPM阵列记录MEG时的改善情况。我们模拟了测量磁场法向分量(nOPM;102个传感器)、切向分量(tOPM;204个传感器)或所有分量(aOPM;306个传感器)的OPM阵列。我们基于10名成年人头部的磁共振图像建立了正向模型;我们采用了三室边界元模型,并将电流偶极子均匀分布在皮质层上。与SQUID磁力仪相比,nOPM和tOPM产生的信号功率分别高出7.5倍和5.3倍,而源偶极子场模式之间的相关性分别降低了2.8倍和3.6倍。nOPM、tOPM和SQUID梯度仪的场模式相关值相似。体电流分别使nOPM、tOPM和SQUID磁力仪中一次电流的信号平均降低了10%、72%和15%。OPM阵列的信息容量明显高于SQUID阵列。各阵列的偶极子定位精度相似,而基于最小范数的点扩散函数在SQUID阵列中平均比nOPM和tOPM阵列分别宽2.4倍和2.5倍。