• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
LUNGx Challenge for computerized lung nodule classification.用于计算机化肺结节分类的LUNGx挑战赛。
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Oct;3(4):044506. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.4.044506. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
2
Radiologists' performance for differentiating benign from malignant lung nodules on high-resolution CT using computer-estimated likelihood of malignancy.放射科医生利用计算机估计的恶性可能性在高分辨率CT上鉴别肺结节良恶性的表现。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Nov;183(5):1209-15. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.5.1831209.
3
Computer-aided diagnosis of lung nodules on CT scans: ROC study of its effect on radiologists' performance.CT 扫描肺结节的计算机辅助诊断:对放射科医生性能影响的 ROC 研究。
Acad Radiol. 2010 Mar;17(3):323-32. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.10.016.
4
Computer-aided diagnosis to distinguish benign from malignant solitary pulmonary nodules on radiographs: ROC analysis of radiologists' performance--initial experience.计算机辅助诊断在X线片上鉴别孤立性肺结节的良恶性:放射科医生表现的ROC分析——初步经验
Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):469-74. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272020498.
5
Computer-aided Diagnosis for Lung Cancer: Usefulness of Nodule Heterogeneity.肺癌的计算机辅助诊断:结节异质性的效用
Acad Radiol. 2017 Mar;24(3):328-336. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.007. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
6
JOURNAL CLUB: Computer-Aided Detection of Lung Nodules on CT With a Computerized Pulmonary Vessel Suppressed Function.期刊俱乐部:CT 计算机辅助检测肺结节与计算机化肺血管抑制功能
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Mar;210(3):480-488. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18718. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
7
Estimation of malignancy of pulmonary nodules at CT scans: Effect of computer-aided diagnosis on diagnostic performance of radiologists.CT 扫描中肺结节恶性程度的评估:计算机辅助诊断对放射科医生诊断性能的影响。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jun;17(3):216-221. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13362. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
8
Computer-aided diagnostic scheme for distinction between benign and malignant nodules in thoracic low-dose CT by use of massive training artificial neural network.基于大规模训练人工神经网络的胸部低剂量CT中良恶性结节鉴别的计算机辅助诊断方案
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Sep;24(9):1138-50. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2005.852048.
9
Usefulness of an artificial neural network for differentiating benign from malignant pulmonary nodules on high-resolution CT: evaluation with receiver operating characteristic analysis.人工神经网络在高分辨率CT上鉴别肺良性与恶性结节的效用:通过受试者操作特征分析进行评估
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Mar;178(3):657-63. doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.3.1780657.
10
Automated lung nodule classification following automated nodule detection on CT: a serial approach.CT自动检测结节后的肺结节自动分类:一种序列方法。
Med Phys. 2003 Jun;30(6):1188-97. doi: 10.1118/1.1573210.

引用本文的文献

1
Vision-Language Model-Based Semantic-Guided Imaging Biomarker for Lung Nodule Malignancy Prediction.基于视觉语言模型的语义引导成像生物标志物用于肺结节恶性预测
ArXiv. 2025 Aug 8:arXiv:2504.21344v2.
2
Establishing predictive models for malignant and inflammatory pulmonary nodules using clinical data and CT imaging features.利用临床数据和CT影像特征建立恶性及炎性肺结节的预测模型。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Apr 1;15(4):2957-2970. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-2338. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
3
Deep Learning in Thoracic Oncology: Meta-Analytical Insights into Lung Nodule Early-Detection Technologies.胸部肿瘤学中的深度学习:肺结节早期检测技术的荟萃分析见解
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;17(4):621. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040621.
4
Vascular Biomarkers for Pulmonary Nodule Malignancy: Arteries vs. Veins.用于肺结节恶性肿瘤的血管生物标志物:动脉与静脉
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 26;16(19):3274. doi: 10.3390/cancers16193274.
5
Outcome Prediction Using Multi-Modal Information: Integrating Large Language Model-Extracted Clinical Information and Image Analysis.使用多模态信息进行结果预测:整合大语言模型提取的临床信息与图像分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 29;16(13):2402. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132402.
6
AMTLDC: a new adversarial multi-source transfer learning framework to diagnosis of COVID-19.AMTLDC:一种用于新冠肺炎诊断的新型对抗多源迁移学习框架。
Evol Syst (Berl). 2023 Jan 12:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s12530-023-09484-2.
7
Healthcare As a Service (HAAS): CNN-based cloud computing model for ubiquitous access to lung cancer diagnosis.医疗即服务(HAAS):基于卷积神经网络的云计算模型,用于肺癌诊断的普遍访问。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 27;9(11):e21520. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21520. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
Survival Prediction of Patients with Bladder Cancer after Cystectomy Based on Clinical, Radiomics, and Deep-Learning Descriptors.基于临床、影像组学和深度学习特征的膀胱癌患者膀胱切除术后生存预测
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 1;15(17):4372. doi: 10.3390/cancers15174372.
9
Integration of Radiomics and Tumor Biomarkers in Interpretable Machine Learning Models.可解释机器学习模型中影像组学与肿瘤生物标志物的整合
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 25;15(9):2459. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092459.
10
Development and performance evaluation of a deep learning lung nodule detection system.深度学习肺结节检测系统的开发与性能评估。
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Nov 22;22(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00938-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Radiological Image Traits Predictive of Cancer Status in Pulmonary Nodules.预测肺结节癌症状态的放射学图像特征
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Mar 15;23(6):1442-1449. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-3102. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
2
Predicting Malignant Nodules from Screening CT Scans.通过筛查CT扫描预测恶性结节
J Thorac Oncol. 2016 Dec;11(12):2120-2128. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
3
Improved pulmonary nodule classification utilizing quantitative lung parenchyma features.利用定量肺实质特征改进肺结节分类
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015 Oct;2(4):041004. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.041004. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
4
Solid pulmonary nodule risk assessment and decision analysis: comparison of four prediction models in 285 cases.实性肺结节风险评估与决策分析:285例中四种预测模型的比较
Eur Radiol. 2016 Sep;26(9):3071-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4138-9. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
5
Computer-aided classification of lung nodules on computed tomography images via deep learning technique.通过深度学习技术对计算机断层扫描图像上的肺结节进行计算机辅助分类
Onco Targets Ther. 2015 Aug 4;8:2015-22. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S80733. eCollection 2015.
6
Lung Lesion Extraction Using a Toboggan Based Growing Automatic Segmentation Approach.基于雪橇的生长式自动分割方法提取肺部病变。
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 Jan;35(1):337-53. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2474119. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
7
LUNGx Challenge for computerized lung nodule classification: reflections and lessons learned.计算机化肺结节分类的LUNGx挑战:思考与经验教训
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2015 Apr;2(2):020103. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.2.020103.
8
A Query Tool for Investigator Access to the Data and Images of the National Lung Screening Trial.供研究者访问国家肺癌筛查试验数据和图像的查询工具。
J Digit Imaging. 2015 Aug;28(4):439-47. doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9785-5.
9
Solid, part-solid, or non-solid?: classification of pulmonary nodules in low-dose chest computed tomography by a computer-aided diagnosis system.实性、部分实性或非实性?:计算机辅助诊断系统在低剂量胸部 CT 中对肺结节的分类。
Invest Radiol. 2015 Mar;50(3):168-73. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000121.
10
Assessing probability of malignancy in solid solitary pulmonary nodules with a new Bayesian calculator: improving diagnostic accuracy by means of expanded and updated features.使用新的贝叶斯计算器评估实体性孤立性肺结节的恶性概率:通过扩展和更新特征提高诊断准确性。
Eur Radiol. 2015 Jan;25(1):155-62. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3396-2. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

用于计算机化肺结节分类的LUNGx挑战赛。

LUNGx Challenge for computerized lung nodule classification.

作者信息

Armato Samuel G, Drukker Karen, Li Feng, Hadjiiski Lubomir, Tourassi Georgia D, Engelmann Roger M, Giger Maryellen L, Redmond George, Farahani Keyvan, Kirby Justin S, Clarke Laurence P

机构信息

The University of Chicago , Department of Radiology, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.

University of Michigan , Department of Radiology, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.

出版信息

J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Oct;3(4):044506. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.4.044506. Epub 2016 Dec 19.

DOI:10.1117/1.JMI.3.4.044506
PMID:28018939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5166709/
Abstract

The purpose of this work is to describe the LUNGx Challenge for the computerized classification of lung nodules on diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans as benign or malignant and report the performance of participants' computerized methods along with that of six radiologists who participated in an observer study performing the same Challenge task on the same dataset. The Challenge provided sets of calibration and testing scans, established a performance assessment process, and created an infrastructure for case dissemination and result submission. Ten groups applied their own methods to 73 lung nodules (37 benign and 36 malignant) that were selected to achieve approximate size matching between the two cohorts. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for these methods ranged from 0.50 to 0.68; only three methods performed statistically better than random guessing. The radiologists' AUC values ranged from 0.70 to 0.85; three radiologists performed statistically better than the best-performing computer method. The LUNGx Challenge compared the performance of computerized methods in the task of differentiating benign from malignant lung nodules on CT scans, placed in the context of the performance of radiologists on the same task. The continued public availability of the Challenge cases will provide a valuable resource for the medical imaging research community.

摘要

这项工作的目的是描述LUNGx挑战赛,该挑战赛旨在对诊断性计算机断层扫描(CT)图像上的肺结节进行计算机化分类,判断其为良性或恶性,并报告参与者的计算机化方法以及六名参与观察者研究的放射科医生在相同数据集上执行相同挑战任务的表现。该挑战赛提供了校准和测试扫描集,建立了性能评估流程,并创建了病例传播和结果提交的基础设施。十组研究人员将他们自己的方法应用于73个肺结节(37个良性和36个恶性),这些肺结节的选择旨在使两个队列之间的大小大致匹配。这些方法的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)值在0.50至0.68之间;只有三种方法在统计学上比随机猜测表现更好。放射科医生的AUC值在0.70至0.85之间;三名放射科医生在统计学上比表现最佳的计算机方法表现更好。LUNGx挑战赛比较了计算机化方法在CT扫描上区分良性和恶性肺结节任务中的表现,并将其置于放射科医生在同一任务中的表现背景下。挑战赛病例的持续公开可用性将为医学影像研究界提供宝贵资源。