Droit-Volet Sylvie, Trahanias Panos, Maniadakis Michail
Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, UMR 6324, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas (FORTH), Heraklion, Crete Greece.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Feb;173:116-121. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
This study investigated relations between judgments of passage of time and judgments of long durations in everyday life with an experience sampling method. Several times per day, the participants received an alert via mobile phone. On each alert, at the same time as reporting their experience of the passage of time, the participants also estimated durations, between 3 and 33s in Experiment 1, and between 2 and 8min in Experiment 2. The participants' affective states and the difficulty and attentional demands of their current activity were also assessed. The results replicated others showing that affective states and the focus of attention on current activity are significant predictors of individual differences in passage-of-time judgments. In addition, the passage-of-time judgments were significantly related to the duration judgments but only for long durations of several minutes.
本研究采用经验取样法，调查了日常生活中时间流逝判断与长时间持续时间判断之间的关系。参与者每天会收到几次手机提醒。每次提醒时，参与者在报告他们对时间流逝的体验的同时，还会估计持续时间，实验1中持续时间为3至33秒，实验2中为2至8分钟。此外，还评估了参与者的情感状态以及他们当前活动的难度和注意力需求。研究结果重复了其他研究的发现，即情感状态和对当前活动的注意力焦点是时间流逝判断中个体差异的重要预测因素。此外，时间流逝判断与持续时间判断显著相关，但仅适用于几分钟的长时间。
